You are right. Ops4J is a better place. On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Charles, > > this is something better to be asked at ops4j :) > I cross-posted it, maybe harald can give you some more insights to this. > > regards, Achim > > > 2012/8/20 Charles Moulliard <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > > > Concerning the pax-cdi project, I have different questions that I would > > like to discuss with you. > > > > - Is the goal of pax-cdi to become the reference implementation of OSGI > CDI > > (http://blog.osgi.org/2012/05/osgicdi-integration-rfp-available-for.html > ) > > as mentioned on pax-cdi home page? > > - As there is already an Apache project called Deltaspike to support CDI > > injection in non J2EE environment, pax-cdi could benefit of using Apache > > DeltaSpike to run weld, openwebbbeans, openeejb top of karaf ? > > - Is the goal of pax-cdi to be a facade, proxy top of existing CDI > > containers (weld, ...) ? > > - How this integration will be achieved with Karaf (one CDI global > > container or each bundle deployed on karaf will act as a light CDI > > container (like we do with Spring - ApplicationContext) ? > > > > Regards, > > > > Charles > > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Hey JB, > >> > >> thanks for the pointers :) > >> > >> Just for all that are anxious about seeing a Pax CDI, which is really > cool > >> already. > >> We are also working on bringing it to work with Pax-Web. This will be > just > >> an > >> incredible boost for Karaf then :) > >> > >> regards, Achim > >> > >> > >> Am 14.08.2012 16:14, schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: > >> > >> Hi guys, > >>> > >>> I guess that you saw that OPS4J projects released new versions > recently. > >>> > >>> I think it could provide new interesting features in Karaf (in standard > >>> features or optional features). Especially I think that pax-jdbc and > >>> pax-cdi could be interesting. > >>> > >>> I started some tests during the night (happy to be still a bit jet > lagged > >>> ;)) and it looks promising and stable. > >>> > >>> I'm working on same of these pax projects (I have new providers > available > >>> for pax-jdbc for instance). > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> JB > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> - Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > >> - OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/**display/paxweb/Pax+Web/< > http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>> > >> Committer & Project Lead > >> - OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/** > >> display/PAXVAADIN/Home < > http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>> > >> Committer & Project Lead > >> - Blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/**> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Charles Moulliard > > Apache Committer / Sr. Pr. Consultant at FuseSource.com > > Twitter : @cmoulliard > > Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > > > > -- > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> > Committer & Project Lead > OPS4J Pax for Vaadin > <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project > Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> > -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Sr. Pr. Consultant at FuseSource.com Twitter : @cmoulliard Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
