+1(non-binding) Karaf 2.3.0 - Spring 3.0.x Karaf 3.0 - Spring 3.1 (high priority) Karaf 2.4 - Spring 3.1 (low priority)
On Oct 14, 2012, at 11:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Hendy, > > I don't think it's a good thing to "major" Spring update in a minor Karaf > version. > > If Spring 3.1 is required "quickly", we can provide a Karaf 2.4.x. However, > as already said, we should focus on Karaf 3.0.0 which already provide Spring > 3.1 support (and avoid a 2.4.x branch). > > Regards > JB > > On 10/14/2012 12:38 PM, Hendy Irawan wrote: >> I strongly support Spring 3.1 for future Karaf 2.3.1 :-) >> >> If one requires strictly Spring 3.0, they can still use Karaf 2.3.0 or can >> use "spring30" feature. But I doubt anyone would ever need it (hopefully). >> >> Hendy >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Apache-Karaf-2-3-0-very-close-tp4026295p4026385.html >> Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com
