my motivation for this is not to release "versions side by side", but to
ease migration and related testing

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: java 7 osgi core & compendium
From: Andreas Pieber <[email protected]>
To: Apache Karaf <[email protected]>
Date: Thu 01 Nov 2012 01:30:48 PM CDT
> I'm not quite sure about that part... why do we want to add the artifactIds
> as properties? a) they wont change that much b) we do not really want to
> release karaf versions for multible core/compendium versions side by side.
>
> Just my 0.02€
>
> Kind regards,
> Andreas
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]
>> wrote:
>> JB: great, thank you!
>>
>> also:
>>
>> since migration to R5 will probably be as painful as this one, I suggest
>> to have more properties, such as
>>
>>         <osgi.groupId>org.osgi</osgi.groupId>
>>         <osgi.core.version>4.3.1</osgi.core.version>
>>         <osgi.compendium.version>4.3.1</osgi.compendium.version>
>>         <osgi.core.artifactId>org.osgi.core</osgi.core.artifactId>
>>
>>
>> <osgi.compendium.artifactId>org.osgi.compendium</osgi.compendium.artifactId>
>>
>> and to make switch between osgi releases controlled via maven profile(s)
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: java 7 osgi core & compendium
>> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>> To: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Felix Dev <[email protected]>, Karaf Dev <[email protected]>
>> Date: Thu 01 Nov 2012 11:51:51 AM CDT
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I will work on it tonight.
>>> I keep you posted.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 11/01/2012 05:50 PM, Andrei Pozolotin wrote:
>>>> JB:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.osgi.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=153
>>>>
>>>> I tried to migrate karaf trunk to new osgi 4.3.1
>>>> https://github.com/carrot-garden/carrot-apache-karaf/tree/osgi-4.3.1
>>>>
>>>> so far compile fails. I hope JB has better luck.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> Subject: Re: java 7 osgi core & compendium
>>>> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Date: Tue 30 Oct 2012 05:26:53 AM CDT
>>>>> Thanks David,
>>>>>
>>>>> I gonna make a try in Karaf.
>>>>>
>>>>> I keep you posted.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/30/2012 11:24 AM, David Bosschaert wrote:
>>>>>> I've uploaded the 4.3.1 jars to the Maven Central staging area. It
>>>>>> would be great if someone could check that they are indeed working
>>>>>> fine and properly signed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See: https://www.osgi.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=153#c13
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8 October 2012 20:45, Andrei Pozolotin
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> David:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> great! thank you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I answered back on https://www.osgi.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=153
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andrei.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: java 7 osgi core & compendium
>>>>>>> From: David Bosschaert <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>> Date: Mon 08 Oct 2012 03:05:18 AM CDT
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Andrei,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I left a comment on that bug and reassigned it to me, as I have been
>>>>>>> the one who uploaded OSGi Artifacts to Maven in the recent past.
>>>>>>> I would be happy to help getting OSGi 4.3 artifacts in maven that
>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>> with Java 7.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5 October 2012 20:03, Andrei Pozolotin
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      *Felix and Jean-Baptiste*:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      since osgi alliance does not want to take responsibility for
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> https://www.osgi.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=153
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      1) do you think it would be appropriate for felix or karaf to
>>>>>>> step in,
>>>>>>>      and to produce and maintain shared java 7 osgi core & compendium
>>>>>>>      jars for all of us?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      2) or else should everyone continue to bake their own?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      3) if shared, can you agree who should lead?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      Thank you,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      Andrei
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>

Reply via email to