On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>wrote:
> Catcha. > > I think that if we update the feature XML (including the URL of bundles), > it works with a simple URL refresh on the features repositories. > > My point is: if the user override the features XML in the system repo, it > already works. So we can apply diff + patch -p0 directly on the features > XMLs. > >From my perspective, a feature like this a great step forward as I seem to spend a decent amount of time customizing feature files just as Dan described. While I agree that updating the file in the system repo (what I do today) works, it's not really very convenient when you are trying to synchronize across multiple containers. You wind up with a lot of scripts doing changes behind the scenes. It would be much more convenient to be able to deploy patch files into Karaf and let the container handle the changes appropriately. Chris > > Regards > JB > > > On 02/26/2013 05:30 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> >> On Feb 26, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> What is the value comparing to just a URL refresh and bundle refresh ? >>> Not sure to see the point. >>> >> >> Basically, to allow productizations of Karaf to more easily unify >> versions of various libraries. For example, lets suppose the CXF >> features.xml pulls in a particular version of something, lets say WSS4J. >> Camel, because they may run a little behind CXF, may have an older version >> in their features.xml. (forget ranges and forget the obr for second) If >> we could map URL's, we could leave the camel features file alone. There >> are a bunch of bundles that CXF and Camel (and others) have at different >> patch levels. Yes, we can work in the communities to unify some of that, >> but that still leaves the people that are trying to mix and match various >> versions to have some extra headaches. >> >> The other scenario would be that Camel imports the CXF features file. >> Thus, to get Camel to use a new version of CXF requires a patched version >> of the Camel features.xml or you end up with both versions of CXF in the >> features:list. If we could map the URL for the imported features.xml, >> then we could, more simply, prevent these issues. >> >> Dan >> >> >> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 02/26/2013 05:12 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Could this be even more "generic" and apply to everything loaded via a >>>> URL? Swap the version of "xerces" with this new version. Or use specs >>>> 2.2 instead of 2.1 or similar. >>>> >>>> Dan >>>> >>>> >>>> On Feb 26, 2013, at 3:46 AM, Christian Schneider < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> sometimes we have the issue that a feature file of an already released >>>>> project is incorrect. Another similar case is if a small issue appears >>>>> that >>>>> can be fixed by just patching a single bundle. >>>>> In both cases it is necessary to change an existing feature file to >>>>> make this work without a new release and without making user apps bump up >>>>> the dependency to the feature file to the next bugfix release number. >>>>> >>>>> So I thought about a way to patch feature files at runtime. >>>>> >>>>> The idea is to have a config with: >>>>> <mvn url of feature>:<path to patch> >>>>> >>>>> This config would make the feature command apply the patches to the >>>>> named feature files after loading them. So a user could patch their >>>>> feature >>>>> files to quickly fix simple issues. >>>>> >>>>> What do you think? >>>>> >>>>> Christian >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Christian Schneider >>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de >>>>> >>>>> Open Source Architect >>>>> http://www.talend.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> [email protected] >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
