The scope of karat features is also much much smaller than subsystems since karat features don't provide isolation.
david jencks On Apr 12, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Andrei, > > the first plan is to coexist. > > It's the same plan for P2 repositories. > > Features is the central and main provisioning for Karaf: we don't plan to > move to something else for now. > However, provide "bridges" between others systems (like subsystems and P2) is > interesting (both in the runtime and in the karaf-maven-plugin). > > The scope coverage of the Karaf features is "larger" (at least for now) than > subsystem. For instance, the ConfigAdmin/ConfigFile support is very limited > in subsystems comparing to Karaf Features. > > Regards > JB > > On 04/12/2013 06:48 PM, Andrei Pozolotin wrote: >> Jean-Baptiste >> >> Can you please clarify what are karaf plans >> as it relates to features vs subsystems? >> http://blog.osgi.org/2012/06/core-release-5-and-enterprise-release-5.html >> * will features be replaced by subsystems? >> * will features continue as independent? >> * will they co-exist >> * etc. >> >> Thank you, >> >> Andrei >> >> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com
