Well, I definitely need r5 in karaf 2.4. I'd rather go for 2.3 and 3.0 as r4.3 and 2.4 and 3.1 as r5.
2014-06-30 20:57 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > Hi Benjamin, > > it's exactly the purpose: > - 2.x (2.4.0) will be aligned to 3.0.x, so OSGi 4.3.1 with Felix 4.2.1 and > Equinox 3.8.2 > - I will create (when necessary) a karaf-3.1.x branch with OSGi r5 (Felix > 4.4.0 and Equinox 3.9.1 as we have on master). > > Regards > JB > > > On 06/30/2014 08:07 PM, Benjamin Graf wrote: > >> Hi, >> maybe create another branch (3.1.x) for r5? It's a bit odd that 2.4 will >> be r5 ready but no 3.x version. :-) >> Regards >> Benjamin >> *Gesendet:* Montag, 30. Juni 2014 um 13:47 Uhr >> *Von:* "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <j...@nanthrax.net> >> *An:* "Karaf Dev" <dev@karaf.apache.org> >> *Betreff:* [INFO] Apache Karaf 3.0.2 will be OSGi r4.3 >> Hi all, >> >> just an important note. >> >> We upgraded karaf-3.0.x branch to Felix 4.4.0/Equinox 3.9.1, so OSGi r5 >> in 3.0.2-SNAPSHOT. >> >> I think it wasn't a good upgrade for two reasons: >> 1/ we changed the OSGi release support in a minor version of a branch >> 2/ we potentially break dependency projects, it's the case for Pax Web >> 3.1 for instance. >> >> So, I will do the following: >> - master branch (Karaf 4.0.0-SNAPSHOT) will be OSGi r5, with Felix 4.4.0 >> and Equinox 3.9.1 (as it's the case right now) >> - karaf-3.0.x branch (Karaf 3.0.2-SNAPSHOT) will be OSGi r4.3, with >> Felix 4.2.1 and Equinox 3.8 (as it was in Karaf 3.0.1) >> >> I will update the schedule plan on the website too. >> >> Regards >> JB >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
