Hi Matt,
I didn't use log4j-slf4j-impl as I did a pax-logging-service native
log4j service.
However, it could be interesting as a transition to support log4jv2
directly in Karaf without a new version of pax-logging.
Let me try it.
Thanks for the update
Regards
JB
On 07/21/2014 11:41 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
Log4j2 has slf4j versions of log4j2 markers, so it would work fine to use
the SLF4J ones. In fact, if it helps, you can use the log4j-slf4j-impl
bundle to bridge log4j-api and log4j-core into slf4j-api.
On 21 July 2014 14:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
Hi Gareth,
I refactored the Markers to use slf4j marker in the case of usage of slf4j
pax-logging-service usage, or natively log4j2 native when using log4j
pax-logging-service.
I will add a couple of unit test about that.
Regards
JB
On 07/21/2014 07:36 PM, Gareth wrote:
Hello Jean-Baptiste,
I am curious - for the 1.8.0 release are you planning to do anything
different with Markers? I understand that Pax Logging currently converts
any
Markers into an MDC parameter (slf4j.marker) because log4j doesn't support
them. However both log4j2 and logback do support Markers natively. Just
curious.
thanks in advance,
Gareth
--
View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.
com/Any-news-on-the-Log4j-2-upgrade-tp4034325p4034344.html
Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
