I've worked on those things a year ago specifically for fabric, so there's
a lot of overlap between what you propose and the insight stuff inside
fabric.
I think we should be able to contribute what we have too, trying to
abstract a bit the things that are fabric specific.
There's plenty of stuff we already have (jmx, camel, jetty and activemq and
pax interceptors, elastic search + indices housekeeping, etc..), so no need
to reinvent the wheel here.
There's definitely a great need and potential here, so I'd love the idea of
collaborating on this area.

2014-10-14 17:12 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>:

> Hi all,
>
> First of all, sorry for this long e-mail ;)
>
> Some weeks ago, I blogged about the usage of ELK 
> (Logstash/Elasticsearch/Kibana)
> with Karaf, Camel, ActiveMQ, etc to provide a monitoring dashboard (know
> what's happen in Karaf and be able to store it for a long period):
>
> http://blog.nanthrax.net/2014/03/apache-karaf-cellar-camel-
> activemq-monitoring-with-elk-elasticsearch-logstash-and-kibana/
>
> If this solution works fine, there are some drawbacks:
> - it requires additional middlewares on the machines. Additionally to
> Karaf itself, we have to install logstash, elasticsearch nodes, and kibana
> console
> - it's not usable "out of the box": you need at least to configure
> logstash (with the different input/output plugins), kibana (to create the
> dashboard that you need)
> - it doesn't cover all the monitoring needs, especially in term of SLA: we
> want to be able to raise some alerts depending of some events (for
> instance, when a regex is match in the log messages, when a feature is
> uninstalled, when a JMX metric is greater than a given value, etc)
>
> Actually, Karaf (and related projects) already provides most (all) data
> required for the monitoring. However, it would be very helpful to have a
> "glue", ready to use and more user friendly, including a storage of the
> metrics/monitoring data.
>
> Regarding this, I started a prototype of a monitoring solution for Karaf
> and the applications running in Karaf.
> The purpose is to be very extendible, flexible, easy to install and use.
>
> In term of architecture, we can find the following component:
>
> 1/ Collectors & SLA Policies
> The collectors are services responsible of harvesting monitoring data.
> We have two kinds of collectors:
> - the polling collectors are invoked by a scheduler periodically.
> - the event driven collectors react to some events.
> Two collectors are already available:
> - the JMX collector is a polling collector which harvest all MBeans
> attributes
> - the Log collector is a event driven collector, implementing a
> PaxAppender which react when a log message occurs
> We can planned the following collectors:
> - a Camel Tracer collector would be an event driven collector, acting as a
> Camel Interceptor. It would allow to trace any Exchange in Camel.
>
> It's very dynamic (thanks to OSGi services), so it's possible to add a new
> custom collector (user/custom implementation).
>
> The Collectors are also responsible of checking the SLA. As the SLA
> policies are tight to the collected data, it makes sense that the collector
> validates the SLA and call/delegate the alert to SLA services.
>
> 2/ Scheduler
> The scheduler service is responsible to call the Polling Collectors,
> gather the harvested data, and delegate to the dispatcher.
> We already have a simple scheduler (just a thread), but we can plan a
> quartz scheduler (for advanced cron/trigger configuration), and another one
> leveraging the Karaf scheduler.
>
> 3/ Dispatcher
> The dispatcher is called by the scheduler or the event driven collectors
> to dispatch the collected data to the appenders.
>
> 4/ Appenders
> The appender services are responsible to send/store the collected data to
> target systems.
> For now, we have two appenders:
> - a log appender which just log the collected data
> - a elasticsearch appender which send the collected data to a
> elasticsearch instance. For now, it uses "external" elasticsearch, but I'm
> working on an elasticsearch feature allowing to embed elasticsearch in
> Karaf (it's mostly done).
> We can plan the following other appenders:
> - redis to send the collected data in Redis messaging system
> - jdbc to store the collected data in a database
> - jms to send the collected data to a JMS broker (like ActiveMQ)
> - camel to send the collected data to a Camel direct-vm/vm endpoint of a
> route (it would create an internal route)
>
> 5/ Console/Kibana
> The console is composed by two parts:
> - a angularjs or bootstrap layer allowing to configure the SLA and global
> settings
> - embedded kibana instance with pre-configured dashboard (when the
> elasticsearch appender is used). We will have a set of already created
> lucene queries and a kind of "Karaf/Camel/ActiveMQ/CXF" dashboard template.
> The kibana instance will be embedded in Karaf (not external).
>
> Of course, we have ready to use features, allowing to very easily install
> modules that we want.
>
> I named the prototype Karaf Decanter. I don't have preference about the
> name, and the location of the code (it could be as Karaf subproject like
> Cellar or Cave, or directly in the Karaf codebase).
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [email protected]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Reply via email to