On 14.04.2015 09:32, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
2015-04-14 8:52 GMT+02:00 Christian Schneider <[email protected]>:
I was not aware we have this information in the wires. I will try to
implement it using these.
So what I would do is this:
I start with the features to be stopped / started.
I then propagate down to the subfeatures / bundles.
For each feature processed I compute the state as the highest state of all
features that depend on it and the requested state.
Does that make sense?
I think that's exactly what is currently done.
I don't think so. The state to be set is computed from the highest of
request state and current state of a feature / bundle.
It does not take into account the states of the resources that depend on
the resource.
Christian
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
http://www.talend.com
