That makes sense. Thank you JB
On Monday, 21 December 2015, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Luca, > > see my comment in the Jira. > > Even if Hazelcast Discover SPI is interesting, I would avoid to replace > the Cellar Discovery service by Hazelcast one: even if Cellar uses > Hazelcast, it's not tight to Hazelcast, and so, it could be used by > different backends (zookeeper, yarn, mesos, whatever ...). > > So using hazelcast discovery SPI will tight too much Cellar with > Hazelcast. However, support Hazelcast Discovery SPI as a backend of Cellar > Discovery can make sense. > > Regards > JB > > On 12/21/2015 12:46 PM, lb wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I had a very quick look at cellar discovery service and it looks great >> however in Hazelcast 3.6 a new discovery SPI will be introduced and so far >> there are a few implementation like etcd, dns, consul, kubernetes and some >> other under development: would karaf-cellar adopt them in the future ? >> >> Best regards, >> Luca >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
