+/- 0 I know that some down stream users are already building out Decanter into their projects, long as things are well documented so that they can adjust than things should be fine.
Cheers, Jamie On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (as discussed ;)) > > Agree to use DS in 1.1.x branch that I will create just after 1.0.2 release. > > Regards > JB > > On 02/09/2016 01:22 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: >> >> I recently discussed with JB that the boilerplate code in decanter >> increases. One typical example is that a decanter module needs to >> reference EventAdmin, the Marshaller service and react on >> configurations. In many cases we also need to be able to work with >> ManagedServiceFactories. >> >> So for this case DS seems like a good idea. It can do all of the above >> with very simple annotations and can now also do type safe configs. >> >> The only disadvantage is that we then need the scr feature. As it is >> quite small I think this is a good tradeoff. >> >> What do you think? >> >> If there is no push back then I would like to switch decanter to DS once >> the decanter release 1.0.2 is done. JB then wants to switch the master >> to 1.1.x which allows us to do some more changes then in a bugfix line. >> >> Christian >> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com
