Hello
IMO, alias would be better. But how about child containers?
(instance:create)?
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 20 lis 2019 o 07:50 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> napisał(a):
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm working on adding JMXMP connector on Karaf JMX layer (in addition of
> the RMI connector we already have).
>
> I was thinking about the default JMX context we are using.
>
> Right now, our context contains the Karaf instance name. For users, it
> means they have to use service URL like
> service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/karaf-foo
>
> It's not very convenient/predictable: for instance, in jconsole, the
> users have to use the full service URL.
> Of course, they can change the URL to use /jmxrmi in
> etc/org.apache.karaf.management.cfg but it's not the default.
>
> I propose to either:
> 1. Use /jmxrmi context instead of /karaf-${karaf.name}
> 2. Keep the default /karaf-${karaf.name} context and add an "alias" on
> /jmxrmi
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
