+1, jdk9plus should disappear to make karaf frictionless IMHO Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
Le jeu. 5 mars 2020 à 10:13, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> a écrit : > Hi guys, > > Several users reported issues with JDK 9+ about spec packages. > > Users are struggling about spec packages since JDK 9+ and "classic" > questions are: > > - who’s provide the package ? > - should I use spec bundles and where they are located ? > - should I change bin/karaf to use —add-module ? > - should I use lib/jdk9plus and update etc/jre.properties ? > > IMHO, the always preferred approach should be spec bundles. > > To improve users experience with JDK9+, I would like to create a new > features repository: spec. > This features repository XML will provide spec feature (JAXB, JAXP, …) > that other projects and users can leverage. > It would reduce the coupling with JDK packages and a straight forward > usage. > > Thoughts ? > > Regards > JB
