Hi, I agree with Romain. IMHO, JSON is more flexible and close enough to feature XML.
Regards JB > Le 22 juil. 2020 à 08:58, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Hi Mike, > > Since it is pluggable yes but the side notes are: > > 1. YAML generator/parsers are not consistent even if there is a kind of > spec and it iq quite error prone (see all the mess around k8s and the > wrapper to not manipulate yaml directly) > 2. It is not a pure json AFAIK but an OSGi flavor with comments (not even > the Johnzon built-in flavor - C-style - but a spec version) so good to stay > aligned on the spec and felix IMO > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le mer. 22 juil. 2020 à 08:42, Mike Hummel <m...@mhus.de> a écrit : > >> Hello, >> >> it would be more common to use yaml instead of json for human readable >> configurations... >> >> Is this an option? >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Mike >> >>> On 8. Jul 2020, at 08:49, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Yes, it’s feature support in json format. Inner parser is Johnson (but >> pluggable). >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>>> Le 8 juil. 2020 à 08:41, Steinar Bang <s...@dod.no> a écrit : >>>> >>>> Thanks for the update, JB! >>>> >>>> Out of curiosity: What's "Features JSON"? Karaf features to pull in JSON >>>> support? If so, which parser? Jackson? GSON? Something else...? >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> >>>> - Steinar >>>> >>> >> >>
