Thanks Romain! Answers inline: pon., 31 sie 2020 o 08:57 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> Hi Greg, > > AFAIK there is no "bye bye" ;). > ServletContainerInitializer are not in he whiteboard so you make them > behave as you want and any servlet container has 2 impl of the servlet > context, one for SCI and one for the runtime (where most registration > methods throw exceptions). > Good idea! I already have two implementations (per ServletContextHelper/HttpContext and per servlet/filter as depicted in "140.2.7 Relation to the Servlet Container") and indeed - it's great idea to pass different context to container initializer, while the existing context will be throwing UnsupportedOperationException - thanks! > So it means pax-web can keep being whiteboard++ (ie whiteboard + SCI) by > having these 2 (sadly custom) impl too and rewire it to the runtime > properly. > I fear you will need to do as for http felix impl - ie a filter chain > dispatcher - but this is not crazy and solves all the issues you > mentionned enabling to have all the desired features. Indeed, pax > wouldnt 1-1 delegate to the servlet container but it would be http > whiteboard compatible and still support JSF, JSP, etc.. > No need to change anything what's already in master-improvements branch. I added some filterchains to handle security and preprocessors, so everything is ready, but nothing has to be adjusted for ServletContainerInitializers. regards Grzegorz Grzybek > > Hope it makes sense. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le lun. 31 août 2020 à 08:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> a > écrit : > > > Hi Grzegorz > > > > Enjoy your vacation, and thanks for the update about Pax Web 8. > > > > Waiting for your return, let me try to move forward on JSP/JSF support. > > > > I will keep you posted. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > > Le 31 août 2020 à 08:24, Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com> a > > écrit : > > > > > > Hello > > > > > > I'm on PTO till Tuesday, I'm back to work on Sep 2nd. > > > > > > About Pax Web 8 - indeed, I don't want to hold Karaf 4.3.0 any longer. > > > Whiteboard pattern is actually ready (everything defined in Whiteboard > > spec > > > is in place except tests for Preprocessors and per-context session > > > handling). The problem is that what Pax Web 7 already had is still > > missing. > > > > > > Long story short - Pax Web 7 handled ServletContainerInitializers well > > and > > > it's the fundamental thing to handle JSPs and JSFs. But what I had to > > > change for Whiteboard compliance is actually a bit incompatible with > > those > > > customizers (most importantly - dynamic "ServletContext.addServlet()" > > > according to Whiteboard specification should throw > > > UnsupportedOperationException - so bye bye JSFs). > > > > > > I already have an idea how to "fix" this, but this will again delay Pax > > Web > > > 8 a bit. > > > > > > regards > > > Grzegorz Grzybek > > > > > > pon., 31 sie 2020 o 06:19 Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> > > napisał(a): > > > > > >> Hi guys, > > >> > > >> A quick update about the releases schedule. > > >> > > >> For both Karaf runtime 4.2.10 and 4.3.0.RC2, I have some dependency > > >> releases in progress (Felix FileInstall, Pax Exam, etc). > > >> I will submit these releases to vote this week. > > >> > > >> About 4.3.0.RC2 specifically, I will ping Greg today to see where we > are > > >> on Pax Web 8.0 and help him on that. > > >> As I don’t want to hold 4.3.0 GA too much, we will evaluate a new time > > the > > >> effort for Pax Web 8.0 and eventually define Felix Jetty as default > > >> (temporary). > > >> > > >> About Winegrower 1.0, I have several updates ready (I just have to > > create > > >> the PRs), a couple of new cepages to add. So the 1.0 release will be > in > > >> vote during this week. > > >> > > >> Regards > > >> JB > > >> > > >>> Le 20 août 2020 à 15:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> a > > écrit > > >> : > > >>> > > >>> Hi guys, > > >>> > > >>> As we are getting close to Pax Web 8.0, I think it’s the good timing > to > > >> release Karaf Runtime 4.3.0.RC2 with Pax Web 8.0-SNAPSHOT. > > >>> It would give us time to move forward on 4.3.0 later faster. > > >>> > > >>> Karaf 4.3.0 is blocked by Pax Web for too long now, so, let’s move > > >> forward at least on RC2. > > >>> > > >>> On the other hand, Karaf 4.2.10 is in preparation, as well as > > Winegrower > > >> 1.0 (I’m working on cepages). > > >>> > > >>> I will send some updates about new coming features on which we are > > >> working (spring boot support, devx, flat resolver, and so on). > > >>> > > >>> Regards > > >>> JB > > >> > > >> > > > > >
