I am not sure if that's feature resolver issue. It is rather related to
bundle resolver which determines installation order.
As far I remember from my last debugging session in this area bundles
are installed in computed "dependency" order. It might be that leaf/1
has no direct dependencies on any of its children hence it is installed
first.
Note, that I don't know details on how present feature resolution works
and if its just supplier for graph elements or separate graph computed
by same algorithm as bundles.

Best,
Łukasz


On 15.10.2020 15:47, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> Romain found an issue on the feature resolver about the features ordering.
> 
> For instance, if we have the following features descriptor:
> 
> <features name="global">
>     <feature name="nested1">
>         <bundle>mvn:foo/nested1/2</bundle>
>     </feature>
>     <feature name="nested21">
>         <bundle>mvn:foo/nested21/3</bundle>
>     </feature>
>     <feature name="nested2">
>         <feature>nested21</feature>
>         <bundle>mvn:foo/nested2/2</bundle>
>     </feature>
>     <feature name="leaf">
>         <feature>nested1</feature>
>         <feature>nested2</feature>
>         <bundle>mvn:foo/leaf/1</bundle>
>     </feature>
> </features>
> 
> When installing leaf feature, we expect the following order (for bundles 
> installation):
>  1. foo/nested1/2 bundle (nested1 feature)
>  2. foo/nested21/3 bundle (nested21 feature)
>  3. foo/nested2/2 bundle (nested2 feature)
>  4. foo/leaf/1 bundle (leaf feature)
> 
> However, the order is not this one. During test, we saw that the order is 
> mvn:foo/leaf/1, mvn:foo/nested1/2, mvn:foo/nested21/3, mvn:foo/nested2/2.
> 
> We can see that the leaf bundle is installed before the bundles from 
> inner/transitive features.
> 
> I would like to investigate this behavior and improve this (I would like to 
> check if it’s also the case in previous versions).
> 
> As the target of Karaf 4.3.0 is this week end, I would take some time to 
> check and compare.
> 
> I will keep you posted.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 

Reply via email to