Hi JB, Did you find some time to have a look at my example ?
Best regards, Steven On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:46 PM Steven Huypens <steven.huyp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi JB, > > This pom.xml illustrates the problem : > https://github.com/ponziani/karaf-simple-suite > > Kind regards, > Steven > > On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 5:12 PM JB Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > >> In that case, it’s weird as Karaf uses jdk11 to build and I don’t see >> such issue. >> >> Do you have a test repo where I can take a look ? >> >> Thanks >> Regards >> JB >> >> > Le 28 nov. 2021 à 16:21, Steven Huypens <steven.huyp...@gmail.com> a >> écrit : >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I found out package-info.java in the >> > package org.apache.karaf.features.internal.model.processing contains >> > >> > @XmlSchema(namespace = >> > "http://karaf.apache.org/xmlns/features-processing/v1.0.0";, >> > elementFormDefault = XmlNsForm.QUALIFIED, attributeFormDefault >> > = XmlNsForm.UNQUALIFIED, >> > xmlns = { >> > @XmlNs(prefix = "", namespaceURI = >> FEATURES_PROCESSING_NS), >> > @XmlNs(prefix = "f", namespaceURI = >> > FeaturesNamespaces.URI_CURRENT) >> > } >> > ) >> > >> > >> > These annotations are ignored when using Java 11, I have no idea why, >> but >> > looks like a bug to me. >> > >> > Kind regards, >> > Steven >> > >> > >> >> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 12:05 PM Steven Huypens < >> steven.huyp...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Bernd, >> >> >> >> I must correct myself. Adding the 'ns3'-prefix to all of the children >> does >> >> help. It seems all of the tags without prefix are ignored at boot-time >> >> which causes the OOM. So maybe a fix in the karaf-maven-plugin would be >> >> best, the prefix should be added to each child... >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Steven >> >> >> >> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 9:56 PM Steven Huypens < >> steven.huyp...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi Bernd, >> >>> >> >>> - I do see 'blacklistedRepositories' in >> >>> http://karaf.apache.org/xmlns/features-processing/v1.0.0 >> >>> - With the namespace-prefix my app goes OOM immediately, so I cannot >> >>> compare both running systems. >> >>> - I tried adding the prefix to each child, but that did not help >> >>> >> >>> Kind regards, >> >>> Steven >> >>> >> >>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 9:23 PM Bernd Eckenfels < >> e...@zusammenkunft.net> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> In that case maybe the child (deny* list?) is ignored, not sure how >> >>>> strict the parser is in regards to namespaces. I don’t see a >> >>>> blacklistRepository element in the Schema anyway. It’s maybe best you >> >>>> inspect the running systems with feature:* commands and look for >> >>>> differences. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> http://bernd.eckenfels.net >> >>>> ________________________________ >> >>>> Von: Steven Huypens <steven.huyp...@gmail.com> >> >>>> Gesendet: Saturday, November 27, 2021 8:58:20 PM >> >>>> An: dev@karaf.apache.org <dev@karaf.apache.org> >> >>>> Betreff: Re: karaf-maven-plugin generates another >> >>>> org.apache.karaf.features.xml with Java 8/Java 11 >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi Bernd, >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks for your response. The child elements have no prefix, eg. >> >>>> <blacklistedRepositories></blacklistedRepositories> >> >>>> >> >>>> I'm sorry but I do not understand what you mean. You think part of my >> >>>> org.apache.karaf.features.xml was previously ignored ? I haven't >> double >> >>>> checked, but that would really surprise me because we have quite some >> >>>> blacklistedFeatures en blacklistedBundles which would cause problems >> if >> >>>> ignored. >> >>>> >> >>>> Best regards, >> >>>> Steven >> >>>> >> >>>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 8:22 PM Bernd Eckenfels < >> e...@zusammenkunft.net> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Hello Steven >> >>>>> >> >>>>> How do the child elements of that element look like? Are they using >> >>>>> default/f/ns2 prefix and maybe the (semantically equivalent) change >> >>>> affects >> >>>>> your memory only because the old form ignored a actual entry for >> >>>> dependency? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Bernd >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> http://bernd.eckenfels.net >> >>>>> ________________________________ >> >>>>> Von: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> >>>>> Gesendet: Samstag, November 27, 2021 8:14 PM >> >>>>> An: dev >> >>>>> Betreff: Re: karaf-maven-plugin generates another >> >>>>> org.apache.karaf.features.xml with Java 8/Java 11 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Hi Steven, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Maybe force jaxb version to an earlier one in karag pluhin >> >>>> dependencies in >> >>>>> your pom. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Le sam. 27 nov. 2021 à 20:05, Steven Huypens < >> steven.huyp...@gmail.com> >> >>>> a >> >>>>> écrit : >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> Hi all, >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> I tried to create my custom Karaf distribution (using >> >>>> karaf-maven-plugin >> >>>>>> 4.3.2) with Java 11 for the first time, and I noticed a difference >> >>>> in the >> >>>>>> resulting org.apache.karaf.features.xml >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> The line >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> <featuresProcessing xmlns=" >> >>>>>> http://karaf.apache.org/xmlns/features-processing/v1.0.0"; >> xmlns:f=" >> >>>>>> http://karaf.apache.org/xmlns/features/v1.6.0";> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> has been changed into >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> <ns3:featuresProcessing xmlns:ns2=" >> >>>>>> http://karaf.apache.org/xmlns/features/v1.6.0"; xmlns:ns3=" >> >>>>>> http://karaf.apache.org/xmlns/features-processing/v1.0.0";> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> which means a namespace has been added. Unfortunately this little >> >>>> change >> >>>>>> has a big impact because now my app immediately runs OutOfMemory >> >>>> when I >> >>>>>> start Karaf. There is very little DEBUG-logging, the behaviour is >> >>>>> somewhat >> >>>>>> like described in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-6068 >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Removing the namespace fixes the problem. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Do you have any idea how I can prevent my app from going OOM after >> >>>> this >> >>>>>> change ? Or how I can prevent the namespace from being added with >> >>>> Java >> >>>>> 11 ? >> >>>>>> It would be nice to understand the exact problem here. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Kind regards, >> >>>>>> Steven >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>
