As it works fine, I plan to upgrade to Pax Logging 2.2.2 for Karaf 4.4.4. No need to wait for 4.5.x.
Regards JB On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 7:59 AM Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello > > For 2.2.x, Pax Logging 2.2.1 was the version where SLF4J 2.0 packages are > exported (see: #504 > <https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/issues/504>[1]). > > Mind that the API for SLF4J didn't really change and the "big" thing is > different discovery of logging implementation (that's why outside of OSGi, > SLF4J 2.0 has to be combined with Logback 1.3+ or dedicated > log4j-slf4j2-impl). It doesn't really impact Pax Logging users. > > regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > === > [1]: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/issues/504 > > pt., 21 lip 2023 o 06:35 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> napisał(a): > > > Hi > > > > I'm working on Karaf releases and plan to create 4.5.x after 4.4.4, > > I'm a bit late in the preparation but the releases votes are planned > > for next week. > > > > However, regarding slf4j 2, Pax Logging already exports the packages > > so I have to check the Pax Logging versions used in Karaf. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 7:54 PM Łukasz Dywicki <l...@code-house.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > I am reactivating this thread because I just ran into issue with > > > dependency which pulls slf4j 2.0.x API. > > > Given it is already 6 months since last message in this topic, is it > > > right time to start 4.5.x branch? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Łukasz > > > > > > On 13.01.2023 07:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > > Hi Robert, > > > > > > > > It makes sense. I will prepare 4.5.x on Jira and I will create the > > > > 4.4.x branch and move main on the 4.5.x version. > > > > > > > > Let me first complete the 4.3.9 release and other Decanter/Cellar > > > > releases first. > > > > > > > > Thanks ! > > > > Regards > > > > JB > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 9:45 PM Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On 08/01/2023 08:33, Mark Derricutt wrote: > > > >>> On 8 Jan 2023, at 20:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Java 11 is not a point as it's already used on Karaf 4.4.x. > > > >>> > > > >>> Altho it seems we can run Karaf 4.4.x under JDK 8 - so now I'm > > curious. > > > >>> I assume nothings being targeting JDK 9+ byte code then. > > > >> > > > >> Right, the karaf-4.4 contract is "YMMV". My proposal here is to switch > > > >> to "./bin/karaf will refuse to run unless you have a JAVA_HOME that > > > >> points to Java 11+". > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> Robert > >
