Hi everyone

In order to include dependency updates (addressing CVEs), I took delay
on the releases (sorry about that).

The 4.4.7 release should be submitted to vote (I'm still trying to
find a workaround on Pax Appender used by log:tail command and zombie
threads).

About 4.5.0, I will work on it during the christmas break (about the
new feature resolver, about the karaf services, ...).

I will keep you posted.

Thanks,
Regards
JB

On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 3:58 PM Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> From Pax Web point of view:
>
>    - there's no new version needed (recent one in Maven Central uses latest
>    Jetty/Tomcat/Undertow versions)
>    - there's no news about Pax Web 10 which will (eventually) use
>    jakarta.servlet packages
>
> thanks JBO!
>
> regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> wt., 5 lis 2024 o 15:25 Jamie G. <jamie.goody...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>
> > Thanks JB for the update.
> >
> > Looking forward to the 4.4.7 RC :)
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 8:25 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > I'm working on the next round of releases and roadmap.
> > >
> > > First, I will submit 4.4.7 to vote soon (I'm fixing the last tickets).
> > > This is a maintenance release, fixing several issues and upgrading
> > > dependencies.
> > >
> > > Then, I will focus on the 4.5.0 release with major changes:
> > > - a new feature service (simple) using a flat resolver. It will be an
> > > alternative to the regular feature service we have today. I will
> > > provide a PR and proposal in a separate email soon.
> > > - start to provide alternatives to Pax * projects. Karaf 4.5.x will
> > > still use Pax * by default, but we will have features for
> > > karaf/services alternatives
> > >
> > > I'm also working on a Karaf 5.x proposal, disruptive with Karaf 4.x.
> > > The purpose is to focus on key features for our users, with a much
> > > modern architecture.
> > > I will provide more details one 4.4.7 and 4.5.0 will be available.
> > >
> > > Stay tuned!
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> >

Reply via email to