to me, ideally, Kibble 1.0 would be when it has the features required to replace Snoot in Apache Projects Statistics [1] (Snoot service could use Kibble 1.0 as its code)
Looking at the "Data Points" page in Kibble demo [2], it seems we're not so far: release early, release often, adding features not available in Snoot for projects.a.o would be for next versions Regards, Hervé [1] https://projects.apache.org/statistics.html [2] https://demo.kibble.apache.org/dashboard.html?page=repos Le vendredi 20 octobre 2017, 16:17:47 CEST Daniel Gruno a écrit : > I'd like to kick off a larger discussion around what we hope Kibble can > achieve, and how this will come about. > > For starters, what sort of data should we collect and display, what > types of visualizations should we offer, and are there special formulas > or algorithms (like Pony Factor) that we'd like to see. Which internal > features should we be using (such as account linking/collating or > collapsable groups of repos based on regex etc)? > > Then comes the bigger points: At what point would we consider Kibble > good enough for a release? What things MUST we have before we can go out > and say "hey, we've got this amazing tool, check it out!"? > > On a similar note, I (and probably Rich too) will be reaching out to the > CHAOSS project over at LF ( http://chaoss.community/ ) to see if we can > work out some specifications and standards with them, for use in Kibble. > > With regards, > Daniel.
