Hi All

I think it would be good for us to start looking at the existing metrics that 
CHAOSS has created and reviewing it against Kibble to see if we have already 
implemented it.
If we have then we can add it as known implementation in the CHAOSS repository. 
This will also help promote Kibble as people will be to see how we conform and 
can deliver against the CHAOSS metric.

https://github.com/chaoss/metrics/blob/master/2_Growth-Maturity-Decline.md

For example if we look at the Issue Resolution part of the metrics and the 
questions that have been defined by CHAOSS, I think Kibble can already answer 
these questions:

1. Open Issues : What is the number of open issues?
2. Closed Issues : What is the number of closed issues?
3. Issue Resolution Efficiency : What is the number of closed issues/number of 
abandoned issues?
4. Open Issue Age : What is the the age of open issues?
5. First Response to Issue Duration :What is the duration of time for a first 
response to an issue?
6. Closed Issue Resolution Duration : What is the duration of time for issues 
to be resolved?

So I suggest that we start taking a look at each metric question in isolation 
(maybe as a separate thread), confirm that Kibble can satisfy (or not) the 
metric question and then include an example of the Kibble implementation in the 
example section CHAOSS and also add Kibble as a known implementation of the 
metric

https://github.com/chaoss/metrics/blob/master/activity-metrics/open-issues.md

What do people think? All comments and feedback welcome.

Thanks
Sharan

Reply via email to