Em seg., 25 de set. de 2023 às 11:39, Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti <
[email protected]> escreveu:

> Same here, two committers should be enough.
>
+1


>
> El jue, 21 sept 2023 a las 15:23, Jason Porter (<[email protected]>)
> escribió:
>
> > +1 to just to reviewers, doesn’t need to be a PPMC
> >
> > --
> > Jason Porter
> > Software Engineer
> > He/Him/His
> >
> > IBM
> >
> >
> > From: Alex Porcelli <[email protected]>
> > Date: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 17:53
> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PROPOSAL] Policy for code changes
> > Ricardo,
> >
> > Here in Apache there is no concept of component leadership, it’s a flat
> > structure that is basically [P]PMC and Committers.
> >
> > I’m ok to adjust for 2 committers for now. Would love to hear from others
> > here if we got the consensus that it’s expected.
> >
> > In regard triage, there’s an option with .asf.yaml to have up to 10 users
> > for triage.
> >
> > About the use of bots, any automation is more than welcome. However this
> > needs to be developed and properly maintained. So I suggest to open a new
> > email thread to discuss such topic.
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 2:16 PM ricardo zanini fernandes <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 to what Mario just said. I was about to send the same email.
> > >
> > > For instance, at this moment I have 4 PRs waiting to be merged and with
> > all
> > > honesty, a PPMC will only give his "ok". So it's just a waste of their
> > > time. Eder suggested having leads in each component, which makes a bit
> > more
> > > sense. Or just what you suggested, Alex: 2 commuters. We can adjust as
> we
> > > go.
> > >
> > > The other point is that we should also have a group for triage or have
> a
> > > bot to set reviewers automatically (via codeowners, maybe?). A few
> > > contributors are asking for at least triage/resolve comments
> permissions.
> > > Is that possible?
> > >
> > > Cheers!
> > > --
> > > Ricardo Zanini Fernandes
> > > Vida longa e próspera.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 2:12 PM Alex Porcelli <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Mario,
> > > >
> > > > I think you have a very valid point, and I think this could be
> adjusted
> > > by
> > > > 2 committers. Another thing that we could take advantage in the
> future
> > > is,
> > > > giving the diverse and complex codebase, use codeowners [1] and
> balance
> > > > better the code review among all the committers.
> > > >
> > > > [1] -
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-code-owners
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Alex
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 12:32 PM Mario Fusco <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry if I'm reading and replying to this email with so much delay.
> > > > >
> > > > > > • The other is from a PPMC member.
> > > > >
> > > > > In all honesty this specific constraint seems unnecessarily and
> > > > > excessively restrictive to me. I'm afraid that waiting for an
> > approval
> > > > from
> > > > > a so small group of persons for all the pull requests in all kie
> > > projects
> > > > > could become a serious bottleneck. In this way we may have pending
> > pull
> > > > > requests waiting for weeks or months.
> > > > >
> > > > > The other point of attention is that the whole kie codebase is
> quite
> > > huge
> > > > > and diverse. There could be no more than one person in the PPMC
> group
> > > > with
> > > > > the right competences to give an informed opinion on a specific
> pull
> > > > > request. Or in some cases not even that one. Who will review an
> > > operator
> > > > > written in Go? And even for the core part of Drools (which of
> course
> > is
> > > > my
> > > > > main concern) there could be only Mark to have an idea on how to
> > > review a
> > > > > pull request. And in some specific newer parts like the reliable
> > > session
> > > > or
> > > > > the Quarkus integration maybe not even him.
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you have any opinion on this?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for feedback,
> > > > > Mario
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


-- 
Regards,
--Filippe

Reply via email to