The original proposal was to remove the driver and remove the test that use the driver. Thats precisely what the PR is doing.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 5:05 PM Alex Porcelli <a...@porcelli.me> wrote: > This is not only code that is not tested, it's code that doesn't work > - this is beyond what was originally proposed. > > The original point to keep it was supposed that you could just drop in > classpath the jdbc driver and it would work, the current PR is far > from it. > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:03 AM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti > <ftira...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > And in any case the PR achieves what we intended, removing the driver and > > disabling the test. We already knew the final situation will be a code > that > > is not tested. > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 4:58 PM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti < > > ftira...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > I agree the situation is not ideal, but we know it at least compiled. > And > > > we can add a maven profile to enable the testing if needed (I can > modify > > > the PR to include the "erased" test is a special maven profile) > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 4:10 PM Alex Porcelli <a...@porcelli.me> > wrote: > > > > > >> My concern that by disabling quarkus and tests we have that a > misleading > > >> piece of code that won’t work in any form. The only way to make it > work is > > >> forking, changing code and build local. > > >> > > >> I think this could be much better handled as an external module that > any > > >> community member could host in their own personal organization. > > >> > > >> I struggle to see value on it; > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 9:53 AM Tibor Zimányi <tzima...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hi Francisco, > > >> > > > >> > I checked your PR. What is the expected maintenance model for the > > >> disabled > > >> > tests and code around, please? Are there any volunteers, who will > > >> maintain > > >> > those disabled tests and code around those and make sure it works? > > >> > > > >> > Best regards, > > >> > Tibor > > >> > > > >> > Dňa po 29. 1. 2024, 15:43 Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti < > > >> > ftira...@redhat.com> > > >> > napísal(a): > > >> > > > >> > > I missed to upload some key modification in the pom file, sorry > about > > >> > that, > > >> > > please take another look > > >> > > > > >> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 3:26 PM Alex Porcelli <a...@porcelli.me> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > Francisco, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > My last PR looks exactly the same, but it fails to compile. Can > you > > >> > > clarify > > >> > > > how you managed to get quarkus not forcing on failing > compilation? > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I think you also need to remove references in Kogito runtime > > >> > repository. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 9:10 AM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti < > > >> > > > ftira...@redhat.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I opened PR > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/pull/1971 > > >> > > > > for data-index. > > >> > > > > Basically, the idea is to remove the quarkus dependency and > all > > >> > > > associated > > >> > > > > tests that require it. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 2:32 PM Alex Porcelli < > > >> porce...@apache.org> > > >> > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Sure! Please go ahead > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 8:30 AM Francisco Javier Tirado > Sarti < > > >> > > > > > ftira...@redhat.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Ok, > > >> > > > > > > Can I try removing the driver without removing the code > > >> myself? > > >> > > > > > > I understood that as far as there is not references to the > > >> driver > > >> > > in > > >> > > > > the > > >> > > > > > > code base, we are fine, isnt it? > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 1:58 PM Alex Porcelli < > > >> > porce...@apache.org > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Francisco, > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Modifying the scope to test won’t work, the compilation > will > > >> > > still > > >> > > > > > fail. > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > But even if it could work, having test scope is still a > > >> LEGAL > > >> > > > > > violation, > > >> > > > > > > so > > >> > > > > > > > we can’t have it. > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Regarding us moving this code somewhere else, it > creates a > > >> huge > > >> > > > grey > > >> > > > > > area > > >> > > > > > > > in my opinion. We, as Apache Committers have > > >> responsibilities > > >> > > with > > >> > > > > > > Apache. > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Last option you mentioned was about having it in the > > >> codebase > > >> > > > without > > >> > > > > > > being > > >> > > > > > > > complied, this will create dead code and I’m heavily -1 > with > > >> > this > > >> > > > > > option > > >> > > > > > > > (to not mention that this still a LEGAL issue - as the > > >> source > > >> > > code > > >> > > > > > would > > >> > > > > > > > still not be complying with Apache Foundation legal > > >> > > requirements). > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 6:33 AM Francisco Javier Tirado > > >> Sarti < > > >> > > > > > > > ftira...@redhat.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > And finally, as another alternative that was > suggested in > > >> the > > >> > > > past > > >> > > > > (I > > >> > > > > > > > think > > >> > > > > > > > > was proposed by Enrique and Ricardo, but I do not > recall > > >> the > > >> > > > > details > > >> > > > > > > > right > > >> > > > > > > > > now), we might set up a "non supported extension > repo", > > >> where > > >> > > we > > >> > > > > can > > >> > > > > > > move > > >> > > > > > > > > all addons we have "issues" with, like this one. > > >> > > > > > > > > The reason I am reluctant to completely remove this > one is > > >> > that > > >> > > > it > > >> > > > > > was > > >> > > > > > > > > originally added by community folks in their spare > time > > >> and I > > >> > > > > worried > > >> > > > > > > > about > > >> > > > > > > > > how it would look like for them ( I don't really know > is > > >> they > > >> > > are > > >> > > > > > still > > >> > > > > > > > > using it or not, to be honest) > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 12:27 PM Francisco Javier > Tirado > > >> > Sarti > > >> > > < > > >> > > > > > > > > ftira...@redhat.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > If that is not not working, then I suggest removing > > >> Oracle > > >> > > > > related > > >> > > > > > > > > project > > >> > > > > > > > > > from the module list of the parent poms. That will > > >> prevent > > >> > > its > > >> > > > > > > > > deployment, > > >> > > > > > > > > > but community will still have the code available for > > >> > > community > > >> > > > > > usage. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 12:14 PM Francisco Javier > Tirado > > >> > > Sarti > > >> > > > < > > >> > > > > > > > > > ftira...@redhat.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Hi Alex, > > >> > > > > > > > > >> I think Quarkus-jdbc-oracle can be scoped to test. > Can > > >> you > > >> > > try > > >> > > > > it? > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 9:32 AM Enrique Gonzalez > > >> Martinez > > >> > < > > >> > > > > > > > > >> egonza...@apache.org> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> It is fine then to remove it. That means it is > > >> required > > >> > to > > >> > > > > remove > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> those modules we support using oracle as well > > >> > > > (unfortunately). > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> I am ok removing it all at once. > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> +1 > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> El vie, 26 ene 2024 a las 19:08, Tibor Zimányi (< > > >> > > > > > > tzima...@apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > >) > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> escribió: > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > Thank you for the investigation Alex! With what > you > > >> > > wrote, > > >> > > > I > > >> > > > > > > > > personally > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > agree we should remove all the relevant code. I > > >> think > > >> > > even > > >> > > > if > > >> > > > > > it > > >> > > > > > > > > would > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > somehow work, it would still be a potential > legal > > >> > > problem, > > >> > > > so > > >> > > > > > > > better > > >> > > > > > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > remove all of it. It is in git history, so if > > >> someone > > >> > > would > > >> > > > > > like > > >> > > > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> revive > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > it, it is there. > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > Best regards, > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > Tibor > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > Dňa pi 26. 1. 2024, 19:03 Alex Porcelli < > > >> > > a...@porcelli.me> > > >> > > > > > > > > napísal(a): > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > Coming back here with an updated PR [1] [2] > set > > >> > > following > > >> > > > > the > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> proposed > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > concept to exclude the minimal possible > amount of > > >> > > > code.... > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > Unfortunately it won't work. > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > Although pointed out that the existing > effective > > >> code > > >> > > > (not > > >> > > > > > > test) > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > didn't require the JDBC, is not exactly > accurate > > >> as > > >> > you > > >> > > > can > > >> > > > > > see > > >> > > > > > > > > here > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > [3] with the quarkus-jdbc-oracle (which > brings the > > >> > > oracle > > >> > > > > > > driver > > >> > > > > > > > as > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > dependency). Once this dependency is removed, > the > > >> > > module > > >> > > > > > fails > > >> > > > > > > in > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > compile time (quarkus/hibernate process the > > >> > > > > > > > application.properties > > >> > > > > > > > > in > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > compile time). I've tried all sorts of > > >> combinations > > >> > in > > >> > > > the > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > application.properties, but all of them > result in > > >> the > > >> > > > same > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> compilation > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > failure by Quarkus. > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > If the above description is true and there is > no > > >> > > > > > alternative, I > > >> > > > > > > > > think > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > we can agree that preserving the Oracle code > won't > > >> > have > > >> > > > > only > > >> > > > > > no > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> tests, > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > but will also mislead users with a jar that > says > > >> > > > > > > "oracle-quarkus" > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> that > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > won't work. If this situation holds true, I'd > > >> prefer > > >> > we > > >> > > > > > > > completely > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > remove the Oracle dependency (code and tests). > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > I'd love to hear your thoughts. > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > [1] - > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes/pull/3376 > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > [2] - > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/pull/1969 > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > [3] - > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/pull/1969/files#diff-65c393eaf9cd1897cec903ed11bee1706e53f938eb78d80520dcfbe364738ad6L44-L47 > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 5:39 AM Francisco > Javier > > >> > Tirado > > >> > > > > Sarti > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > <ftira...@redhat.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > Hi Alex, > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > I agree with Enrique. Removing the driver > from > > >> poms > > >> > > > would > > >> > > > > > > have > > >> > > > > > > > > been > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > enough. > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > Im afraid we will have to redo the oracle > stuff > > >> (it > > >> > > was > > >> > > > > not > > >> > > > > > > > easy > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> to avoid > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > code duplication with postgres) at some > moment > > >> in > > >> > the > > >> > > > > > future. > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > I commented on the PR on that regard. > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > So, Im really wondering, and please do not > take > > >> it > > >> > > > wrong, > > >> > > > > > > given > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> than > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > Enrique and myself are the most active > committer > > >> > > > touching > > >> > > > > > > that > > >> > > > > > > > > code > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > section, who agreed on that? > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:50 AM Alex > Porcelli < > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> porce...@apache.org> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > Enrique, > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > I might be interpreting the Category X > > >> dependency > > >> > > way > > >> > > > > too > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> strictly; but > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > it’s my current understanding that we > cannot > > >> have > > >> > > > such > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> dependency in > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > our > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > codebase at all. > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > The direction that we agreed is to avoid > > >> endless > > >> > > > > > discussion > > >> > > > > > > > and > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> just > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > remove > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > for now; once we past the critical phase > of > > >> our > > >> > > first > > >> > > > > > > > release- > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> we can > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > try > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > to explore and discuss different angles to > > >> tackle > > >> > > the > > >> > > > > > > > Category > > >> > > > > > > > > X > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > dependency; it’s just not worth spend time > > >> right > > >> > > now > > >> > > > on > > >> > > > > > it. > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > Hope it clarifies > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 3:21 AM Enrique > > >> Gonzalez > > >> > > > > > Martinez < > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > elguard...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Hi Alex, > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > I don't understand why the code and > scripts > > >> > from > > >> > > > > Oracle > > >> > > > > > > are > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> being > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > removed. If the only problem is the > binary > > >> > > > > dependency I > > >> > > > > > > > don't > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> see > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > remove code for oracle is required > unless > > >> > Oracle > > >> > > > word > > >> > > > > > is > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> something > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > subject to not being used in Apache. > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > I would suggest only to remove the > > >> dependencies > > >> > > and > > >> > > > > for > > >> > > > > > > the > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> test just > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > execute it conditional only if the > driver is > > >> > > > > available. > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Cheers :) > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > El mié, 24 ene 2024 a las 0:00, Alex > > >> Porcelli > > >> > (< > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> a...@porcelli.me>) > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > escribió: > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Hi Francisco and team, > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Here are the links for the PRs that > remove > > >> > > > > references > > >> > > > > > > for > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> Oracle > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > database dependencies: > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > - > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes/pull/3369 > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > - > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/pull/1968 > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 6:36 AM > Francisco > > >> > > Javier > > >> > > > > > Tirado > > >> > > > > > > > > Sarti > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > <ftira...@redhat.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Thanks for the info.k > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Quarkus-oracle-jdbc dependency > includes > > >> > > ojdbc11 > > >> > > > > and > > >> > > > > > > > > ori18n, > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > which I'm > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > not > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > sure are affected by this policy. > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > However, kogito-test-utils includes > > >> > > oracle-xe, > > >> > > > > > which > > >> > > > > > > > > seems > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> to be > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > affected, > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > so I'm wondering which should be the > > >> > > approach? > > >> > > > > > > Probably > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> removing > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > the > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > driver > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > and the test associated with it that > > >> will > > >> > > start > > >> > > > > > > failing > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> should be > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > enough. > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Problem is that we will leave some > > >> > > > functionality > > >> > > > > > not > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> tested but I > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > guess > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > that's ok, since, after > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/pull/1941, > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > oracle > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > addon > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > delegates to generic jpa addon. > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:17 PM > Alex > > >> > > Porcelli > > >> > > > < > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> a...@porcelli.me > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Based on this thread [1] and this > > >> legal > > >> > > issue > > >> > > > > > > > feedback > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> [2] - > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > remove > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Oracle driver is required to > comply > > >> with > > >> > > > Apache > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> Foundation > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > requirements. > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > I created the issue [3] and this > is a > > >> > > blocker > > >> > > > > for > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> release. I'm > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > planning to work on this myself. > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > [1] > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/1t29vxrnhfxk63j4n6do6g8jhl6l858j > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > [2] > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-663 > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > [3] > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/817 > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > >> > > > > > > > dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > >> > > > > > > > > dev-h...@kie.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > >> > > > > > dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > >> > > > > > > dev-h...@kie.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > -- > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Saludos, Enrique González Martínez :) > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > >> > > > > dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > >> > > > > > dev-h...@kie.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > >> > dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > >> > > dev-h...@kie.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > >> dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: > > >> dev-h...@kie.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@kie.apache.org > >
