Thanks a lot for amending the proposal. Although I agree with almost the whole proposal, as pointed out in my previous e-mails, I did not understand, out of ignorance probably, the need for a cutting point of Category A before Category B. If the criteria is the existence of a dependency, following that rule, apps should force a cut point on runtimes and runtimes should force a cut point on drools. Since we are not doing that and everything is still working, I think I should rule out that as an explanation. It is because we need to test with certain snapshots manually?. Then, the cutting point is almost simultaneous with the release isnt it?
If that's the case I propose to slightly amend point 2 by adding manually at the end, so eventually, if we manage to test that automatically, then we can remove fixed snapshots between repos of category A and B. 2. Update Category B repos to point to this timestamped SNAPSHOT, and verify that everything is working manually. On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 3:11 PM Alex Porcelli <porce...@apache.org> wrote: > With all the feedback from the proposal discussion [1], I am starting > this official vote to accept the amended proposal to unblock Apache > KIE 10.0.0 Release. > > Here [2] is the link for the final amended proposal. > > Please cast your vote: > [ ] +1, accept the proposal > [ ] +0, I don't care > [ ] -1, do not accept the amended proposal, with the following > alternative proposal... > > The vote will be open for 72 hours from today, 19 March, 2024. Thanks. > > -- > Alex > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/58xm7pqdyztf7qztmhvntf8wdmvfx7jx > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/pw327lkpmy9gxklq4t5zbwzxjo2y3c0w > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@kie.apache.org > >
