Francisco,

Zulip is not an official channel, so I strongly recommend using ML for that.

This is valid for everyone in the community, individuals should not be
single out for any reason.

On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 10:10 AM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
<ftira...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, that was the idea, to mention the need for a change on jbpm-flow on
> Zulip, pinging Enrique.
> Of course, if I'm also an interested stakeholder for any change in
> jbpm-flow, I expect this to be reciprocal ;)
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 4:01 PM Alex Porcelli <porce...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Francisco,
> >
> > As stated here [1], the particular case you mention would not exactly
> > require a DISCUSS or PROPOSAL, but certainly the HEADS UP could be
> > used as the changes applied modified the engine behavior to some
> > extent.
> >
> > I really would encourage you to AVOID have private conversation
> > between individuals, because Enrique is only one of the interested
> > stakeholders... we should not excluded other community members from
> > such discussions. That's exactly the reason we have the communication
> > procedures established.
> >
> > -
> > Alex
> >
> > [1] -
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KIE/Communication+within+Apache
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 9:54 AM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
> > <ftira...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > Of course, we will be delighted to continue maintaining our high
> > standards
> > > of collaboration that define our community.
> > > However, it is unclear to me if for any community issue that arises as a
> > > consequence of a bug (or perceived bug) in our code base, there is a need
> > > to write a proposal.
> > > I firmly believe proposals should be shared for new features that are
> > large
> > > enough or changes that affect existing functionalities, but I have doubts
> > > that bug fixes (they already have the associated issue) should require a
> > > proposal to be discussed formally through a mail list.
> > > There is not agreement about if this bug fix
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes/pull/3459 should
> > > have been precluded by a proposal. In the context  in which I made the
> > > decision to change an internal (I should remark the word internal) public
> > > method that was exposing an internal map, it seems correct to not bore
> > > everyone in this mailing list with a discussion about a V7 inherited
> > code.
> > > A code that is pretty specific to Split node and that have side effects
> > on
> > > the XML dumper and a couple of visitor classes that were covered by the
> > PR.
> > > I think it will be more practical if, starting from now,  I just contact
> > > Enrique before changing any code under jbpm-flow, and in case we do not
> > > agree on a solution, move the discussion to the overall list so we whole
> > > team vote based on pros and cons of each proposal (although it can be
> > > argued that people unfamiliar with that part of the code will not have
> > > enough elements to make an informed vote). In this particular case, I
> > > should have contacted Enrique to make sure he was fine with the solution
> > > taken.
> > > Thanks for bringing up the topic.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 2:52 PM Alex Porcelli <porce...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I kindly remind everyone of the importance of adhering to our
> > > > established procedures and communication etiquette. These guidelines
> > > > have been implemented to ensure our community operates efficiently,
> > > > respectfully, and inclusively.
> > > >
> > > > For convenience, here are the links to the relevant information [1]
> > [2].
> > > >
> > > > We all share a commitment to the success of the Apache KIE project,
> > > > and following these agreed-upon practices plays a crucial role in
> > > > achieving our collective goals. It helps streamline our interactions
> > > > and ensures a productive and positive environment for all
> > > > contributors.
> > > >
> > > > Should you have any questions or suggestions about these guidelines,
> > > > please feel free to engage in this thread. Let's continue to support
> > > > each other and work together to maintain the high standards of
> > > > collaboration that define our community.
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > Alex
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KIE/Communication+within+Apache
> > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/x499xlrdf5b6vb57mbywxgl7f9mokvkq
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@kie.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@kie.apache.org
> >
> >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@kie.apache.org

Reply via email to