Hello Toshiya, I meant the latter, if the quarkus platform jobs should even exist.
Regards Jan Dne st 7. 8. 2024 9:37 uživatel Toshiya Kobayashi < [email protected]> napsal: > Ah, I might completely misunderstand what Jan said. > > > if we still want to perform any steps towards being part of that > platform. > > Does it mean "Do we want to keep kogito as a part of 'quarkus-platform'"? > > Toshiya > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 3:15 PM Toshiya Kobayashi < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > In the "build sheriffs" discussion, > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/h897tdslwmvhv0fb0ovjo0vgf1xwtnx7 > > > > Tiago suggested CI/CD improvement -- simplifying and easing. > > > > > My opinion is that we could try and concentrate our efforts to reduce > > > the barrier of entry to maintaining the CI and automations we have, > > > while putting a system in place that will naturally have each one of > > > us know at least the basics of how the CI and automations work. > > > > I agree that we may need to fully review the jobs/scripts and slim them > > down. The task may include removing unnecessary jobs and moving a jenkins > > job to a GHA (when it makes sense). > > > > Btw, > > > > Such efforts (including discussions) will take a long time. In the > > meantime, shall we keep fixing kogito-pipelines (and Jenkinsfiles in > other > > repositories) issues? > > > > I'm asking because Jan raised a concern: > > > > > I'd check one thing here with the mailing list - if we still want to > > perform any steps towards being part of that platform. I mean, fixing > > pipelines is a good thing here, but I am not sure if we actually want to > > make it work. > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-pipelines/pull/1229#issuecomment-2268789394 > > > > Per my understanding, Jenkins and kogito-pipelines will not completely go > > away even if we will simplify CI/CD. So it makes sense to fix issues, I > > think. > > > > Please share your thoughts on this. > > > > Regards, > > Toshiya > > >
