Hi everyone, I personally think that after our first release, the most important topic right now is to make sure we don't wait another year for another release. Therefore I think it is important to define the release cadence that we will follow and define a workflow, that we will follow in regular time intervals, based on the agreed cadence. If you would agree, we should first make sure we have regular releases again and then we could open more broad and impactful discussions about repositories structure, etc. Otherwise we risk being blocked for another year by these discussions. So here is my proposal for the release cadence:
- Release should be done each month. - There should be a vote about a person responsible for these monthly releases. We need to have a specific person that makes sure the release workflow is progressing. The person doesn't need to do the actual work, however should make sure the release process is being done in a timely manner. - The person responsible for the release, makes sure the documented standard release process is followed. This is a very rough proposal. I am open for feedback or other proposals. I just think we should stabilize releases before we dive into more broad discussions that could take months. Best regards, Tibor
