do we have any update?

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 7:13 AM Jan Šťastný <jstastn...@apache.org> wrote:

> I am trying to temporarily switch the GHA to use build-chain CLI, which
> should be a local dev fallback (or we used it in jenkins).
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-pipelines/blob/try-nodejs-env-change/.ci/actions/build-chain/action.yml
>
> I am validating the change in my drools PR:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-drools/pull/6293
>
> Though this is not optimal, and perhaps can lead to further bumps down the
> line.
>
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 09:52, Jan Šťastný <jstastn...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I tried the proposed workaround, doesn't seem to help.
> >
> > Though I noticed that windows PR check on Drools repo does provide at
> > least some stacktrace (I tried both 3.5.6 and 3.5.7):
> > Error: Input [Error]: Invalid flow-type
> >     at ActionArguments.getFlowType
> >
> (D:\a\_actions\kiegroup\github-action-build-chain\v3.5.6\dist\index.js:51:66157)
> >     at ActionArguments.parse
> >
> (D:\a\_actions\kiegroup\github-action-build-chain\v3.5.6\dist\index.js:51:66775)
> >     at GithubActionRunner.execute
> >
> (D:\a\_actions\kiegroup\github-action-build-chain\v3.5.6\dist\index.js:51:59953)
> >     at
> >
> D:\a\_actions\kiegroup\github-action-build-chain\v3.5.6\dist\index.js:51:664419
> >     at
> >
> D:\a\_actions\kiegroup\github-action-build-chain\v3.5.6\dist\index.js:51:664430
> >     at Object.<anonymous>
> >
> (D:\a\_actions\kiegroup\github-action-build-chain\v3.5.6\dist\index.js:51:664469)
> >     at Module._compile (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1529:14)
> >     at Module._extensions..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1613:10)
> >     at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1275:32)
> >     at Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1096:12)
> > Node.js v20.19.0
> >
> > I'll investigate further.
> >
> > On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 09:32, Gonzalo Muñoz <gonzalo51...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> In case that it helps, I found this
> >> https://github.com/actions/runner/issues/3766#issuecomment-2753360247
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Gonzalo
> >>
> >> El mié, 26 mar 2025 a las 9:17, Jan Šťastný (<jstastn...@apache.org>)
> >> escribió:
> >>
> >>> Hello, I think this needs an input from someone well versed in NodeJS
> >>> packaging and releases.
> >>>
> >>> The most recent release of build-chain is broken I think. The relevant
> >>> tarball does NOT contain build folder, though package.json references
> >>> that
> >>> in the "bin" section:
> >>>   "bin": {
> >>>     "build-chain": "./build/index.js"
> >>>   },
> >>>
> >>>
> https://registry.npmjs.org/@kie/build-chain-action/-/build-chain-action-3.5.6.tgz
> >>>
> >>>
> https://registry.npmjs.org/@kie/build-chain-action/-/build-chain-action-3.5.7.tgz
> >>>
> >>> Also GitHub runners now use NodeJS 20.19.0, not sure if build-chain
> built
> >>> for older versions should work or not (
> >>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/actions/runner-images/blob/ubuntu24/20250316.1/images/ubuntu/Ubuntu2404-Readme.md
> >>> )
> >>>
> >>> I think the best bet now is to fix the most recent release rather than
> >>> trying to make older versions work - as it seems plain change of the
> npm
> >>> version did not do the trick.
> >>>
> >>> I also noticed there's some effort on ASF infra side related to
> >>> allowlisting of the GHA here:
> >>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-actions/blob/main/approved_patterns.yml
> >>> ....
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Jan
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 19:27, Jan Šťastný <jstastn...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > In the past we also needed to get the action allow-listed by ASF
> infra,
> >>> > not sure if it was version agnostic or not (thus the attempt to
> change
> >>> from
> >>> > v3 to v3.5.5 might have caused a different issue).
> >>> >
> >>> > Dne út 25. 3. 2025 19:03 uživatel Jan Šťastný <jstastn...@apache.org
> >
> >>> > napsal:
> >>> >
> >>> >> Taking a quick look this looks rather like packaging, release or
> >>> >> installation issue.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Dne út 25. 3. 2025 18:49 uživatel Jan Šťastný <
> jstastn...@apache.org>
> >>> >> napsal:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Hello, perhaps some internal GitHub API we rely on might have
> >>> changed.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> I am somewhat familiar with the tool, will take a look in the
> >>> morning.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Regards
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Jan
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Dne út 25. 3. 2025 18:22 uživatel Toni Rikkola
> >>> >>> <trikk...@redhat.com.invalid> napsal:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> This is a pretty critical item.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> How many guys do we know who know the setup?
> >>> >>>> And what is the current status?
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> I have to say my knowledge on this is minimal, but this should be
> >>> >>>> something
> >>> >>>> anyone from the community can maintain. Else we risk crippling the
> >>> >>>> project
> >>> >>>> when we miss a key contributor.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Toni
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 3:17 PM Tibor Zimányi <
> tzima...@apache.org>
> >>> >>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> > Hi everyone,
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>> > the PR checks doesn't work. I am trying to take a look, however
> it
> >>> >>>> would be
> >>> >>>> > great if someone knowledgeable in build-chain and our pipelines
> >>> and
> >>> >>>> GitHub
> >>> >>>> > Actions takes a look, please. There are recent new versions of
> >>> >>>> build-chain
> >>> >>>> > releases, so I though that that is the culprit, however after
> >>> >>>> downgrade to
> >>> >>>> > the previous build-chain used (3.5.5), it still doesn't work.
> Any
> >>> >>>> idea what
> >>> >>>> > could be causing this is welcome. Here is an example of failing
> PR
> >>> >>>> check:
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes/actions/runs/14039620267/job/39369042484
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>> > Best regards,
> >>> >>>> > Tibor
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>

Reply via email to