For example, 
I have just seen this PR 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/pull/2214 that removes the 
JS reactive code, and that has a direct impact on all the current SonataFlow 
installations.



On 2025/04/26 06:51:54 Walter Medvedeo wrote:
> Hi Enrique,
> 
> As you know, the compact architecture, is only one of the architectures 
> supported by the project, but no the only one. I fact, we have many user 
> installations on top of the "non compact architecture". So, any potential 
> refactoring, etc., must keep that in mind.
> 
> In step 4), when you say "remove all features that are not shared among 
> runtimes or they are
> incompatible among runtime":
> 
> Could please enumerate which features are you referring too? i.e, targeted 
> for removal.
> 
> -1 to feature removals that are not clearly notified and agreed with the team.
> 
> Regards,
> Walter.
> 
> 
> On 2025/04/04 07:29:45 Enrique Gonzalez Martinez wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > 
> > Most of you are aware that the configuration supported by the project
> > (the compact architecture) only is supported by quarkus and not SB.
> > This might impact the project adoption in one of the most used
> > microservice frameworks (or standard de facto) for building
> > microservice.
> > 
> > The one thing stopping us from supporting this runtime in compact
> > architecture is these components that require some attention.
> > 
> > We already have patterns on how to deal with this sort of problem.
> > (multiple runtime support), so ideally is to use them to upgrade these
> > components to use those and add support for the runtime. Basically
> > would be
> > 
> > 1. identify the common components and isolate properly without any runtime 
> > use.
> > 2. minimize the codebase deployed in runtime (should be a thin layer)
> > 3. Move the generic tests to the common components and integration
> > test to the runtimes components)
> > 4. remove all features that are not shared among runtimes or they are
> > incompatible among runtimes to avoid code duplication and therefore
> > reduce the sustaining effort.
> > 
> > Let me know your thoughts.
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@kie.apache.org
> > 
> > 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@kie.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@kie.apache.org

Reply via email to