+1 to Remove On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 3:29 PM Jason Porter <jpor...@ibm.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1 to remove > > -- > Jason Porter > Software Engineer > He/Him/His > > IBM > > > From: Enrique Gonzalez Martinez <elguard...@gmail.com> > Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 at 06:12 > To: dev@kie.apache.org <dev@kie.apache.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Discussion] Trusty > +1 to remove > > El mar, 6 may 2025, 14:07, Pere Fernandez <pere.fernan...@gmail.com> > escribió: > > > +1 to remove > > > > El dt., 6 de maig 2025, 13:59, Toni Rikkola <trikk...@redhat.com.invalid > > > > va escriure: > > > > > +1 to remove. > > > > > > Toni > > > > > > On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 1:08 PM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti > > > <ftira...@redhat.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > There is a directory inside kogito-apps repo, called Trusty > > > > < > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/tree/main/trusty > > >, > > > > which is not under active development. > > > > However, when performing a major refactor (as we are planning to do > to > > be > > > > able to deploy "data index" on Springboot) it requires modifications > > > > because the persistence library is common to both modules. > > > > I'm wondering, following the same rationale that we took to remove > > > > Inifinispan, if it will possible to remove Trusty and save a > > substantial > > > > amount of additional work while refactoring. > > > > > > > > Please let me know your thoughts. > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > >
