Good job Gabriele; great improvement

Regards,
_____________
Alex Porcelli
http://porcelli.me

On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 5:21 AM Gabriele Cardosi <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Jijo,
> I've incorporated your suggestions in the Drools PR.
> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-drools/pull/6766>
>
> Cheers
>
> Gabriele
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 10:52 AM Jijo Thomas K <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks @Gabriele <[email protected]> for considering my
> > suggestion,
> >
> > Field Type : What I thought was the type of the value accepted - String,
> > Long, Integer, Date etc..
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jijo Thomas K
> >
> > *From: *Gabriele Cardosi <[email protected]>
> > *Date: *Monday, 22 June 2026 at 1:19 PM
> > *To: *[email protected] <[email protected]>
> > *Cc: *Jijo Thomas K <[email protected]>
> > *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] Re: [HEADS-UP] Annotation of user-configurable
> > properties
> >
> > This Message Is From an External Sender
> > This message came from outside your organization.
> > Report Suspicious
> > <
> https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/AdhS1Rd-!-XFVHHhz_o9zvLrS4iWvXzBTOUgHad1qpamn1QGBUZN6vPCrFC6rigvqsqK86gbyBdcBny8evWjiD0h9qbVetA8LHattzH7sFT4uB1clidG75LhCy3uMhc3819HxDw$
> >
> >
> > Hi all, thanks for your feedback.
> > @Jijo, about your suggestions:
> >
> > "Accessibility" : this is managed by the creation of a second annotation
> -
> > "@KieInternal"; I did not mention in this thread to keep it simple, but
> it
> > is mentioned in the issue
> > <
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_incubator-2Dkie-2Dissues_issues_2349&d=DwMFaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=chE-O7gziZQiZi9dvpCs_NiJukBA2SJazsOwhCN4Zr4&m=54dC1Xa_YDAGwAFnvv_zsJv05wYNoIKDN8qHyVlNy2UjZSi_dQ6LdOuUCUhPZVYH&s=IZ0VHHUb4t3pqexcumGdK6-KQFH9y0GLGfbKuo1_xbU&e=
> >
> > itself;
> > "Default value": ok
> > "Field type": I would like to have a specific metadata for that
> > "Short description": I'm doubtful about that. There is also a PR comment
> > <
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_incubator-2Dkie-2Ddrools_pull_6766-23pullrequestreview-2D4541647613&d=DwMFaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=chE-O7gziZQiZi9dvpCs_NiJukBA2SJazsOwhCN4Zr4&m=54dC1Xa_YDAGwAFnvv_zsJv05wYNoIKDN8qHyVlNy2UjZSi_dQ6LdOuUCUhPZVYH&s=n2Fy5dfMg5vvrj4kkhh7admLKD0o64ArU-OIQaA7lvg&e=>
> on
> > similar terms. My point is that "@KieProperty" ->must have<- javadoc with
> > proper description, to be available also in generated javadocs. And I was
> > thinking to re-use such javadoc also for documentation purposes.  So, a
> > specific "description" metadata would be redundant, IMO.
> >
> > Does that make sense?
> >
> >
> > I would provide the other ones, in the meantime, making them optional to
> > speed-up a bit this first iteration.
> >
> > Thanks again!
> >
> > Gabriele
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 8:26 PM Jijo Thomas K via dev <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Thank you Gabriele, for driving this initiative. I see the strong value
> it
> > brings in terms of clarity and consistency for both KIE developers and
> end
> > users.
> >
> > From a usability perspective, I believe expanding the annotation with
> > additional metadata could make it even more powerful and
> self‑documenting.
> > Alongside the allowed values you’ve already proposed, I feel the
> following
> > fields could also be considered:
> >
> >   *   Accessibility: Whether the property is intended for internal use
> > (KIE developers) or external use (end users).
> >
> >   *
> > Mandatory: Indicates if the property must be provided.
> >   *   Default value: Specifies the default setting, complementing the
> > allowed values list.
> >
> >   *   Short description: A concise explanation of the property’s purpose,
> > including field type (String, integer, Long, Boolean etc).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jijo Thomas K
> >
> > From: soniya abraham via dev <[email protected]>
> > Date: Friday, 19 June 2026 at 5:03 PM
> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > Cc: soniya abraham <[email protected]>
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [HEADS-UP] Annotation of user-configurable
> > properties
> >
> > Hi Gabriele,
> >
> >
> > Thank you for bringing up this idea — great work! I believe it will be
> > very helpful, as it will make it much easier to identify the properties
> and
> > their corresponding values. Having a dedicated annotation will simplify
> > maintenance, improve clarity, and open the door for future enhancements.
> > I’m confident this will add real value moving forward.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Soniya
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Gabriele Cardosi <[email protected]>
> > Date: Friday, 19 June 2026 at 3:48 PM
> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [HEADS-UP] Annotation of user-configurable properties
> >
> > Hi all,
> > during documentation tasks, but also in the development phase, we face
> the
> > issue that a lot of user-configurable properties (e.g. system properties,
> > application.properties) are defined as simple String inside our codebase.
> > This makes both their maintenance and their knowledge hard.
> > We then thought of creating a specific annotation for them.
> > With that in place, such properties will be straightforward to identify
> and
> > track, in case of addition/modification/removal.
> >
> > Having a specific annotation could also allow, in future, the
> > implementation of other features (e.g. define what are the allowed values
> > for each property).
> >
> > The task is defined at the following kie-issue [1]
> >
> > There are already two opened PRs:
> > drools [2]
> > kogito-runtimes [3]
> >
> > to have a better idea of the final result.
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Gabriele
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_incubator-2Dkie-2Dissues_issues_2349&d=DwIBaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=B-xdniRg_RT5v51i5IErRyekoV6Xm0zybs6yQwll-vM&m=h2Cu0VKW0RUxKNknaPvky6B73yq7z64P5OU_2NLFkn9c8fKxc53Co_gI5_nBN8Oj&s=4lBmO36qxpNHrRSkZun7nZfI2GRThNncNUA0OzWe0wY&e=
> > [2]
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_incubator-2Dkie-2Ddrools_pull_6766&d=DwIBaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=B-xdniRg_RT5v51i5IErRyekoV6Xm0zybs6yQwll-vM&m=h2Cu0VKW0RUxKNknaPvky6B73yq7z64P5OU_2NLFkn9c8fKxc53Co_gI5_nBN8Oj&s=B_A5UHBOUoYEjkXZVIu5yCTyZeLt_Rx5qV_nEqLt--w&e=
> > [3]
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_incubator-2Dkie-2Dkogito-2Druntimes_pull_4321&d=DwIBaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=B-xdniRg_RT5v51i5IErRyekoV6Xm0zybs6yQwll-vM&m=h2Cu0VKW0RUxKNknaPvky6B73yq7z64P5OU_2NLFkn9c8fKxc53Co_gI5_nBN8Oj&s=szSy-t82AQpQO_1Oaxfrkimx0VaqOT7W0_x0xYyUwYM&e=
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to