Sumit,

I went through it fairly carefully and I didn¹t find anything which
concerned me terribly.  I like the direction and the implementation.
I left a bunch of line item comments in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-481, but I know you have been
suffering tracking master.
So I¹m +1 on a merge with a followup change to address my ³cleanup² level
feedback.

+1 for merge.

Kevin.

On 2/18/15, 9:28 AM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Cool - thanks, Sumit!
>
>On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Sumit Gupta <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> Sorry it seems that the server stripped my attachment, possibly because
>>I
>> named it poorly.
>>
>> Here it is (hopefully). Also if you would like to create a patch locally
>> to use, you can checkout the branch KNOX-481 and then use:
>>
>> git format-patch master --stdout > KNOX-nnn.patch
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/17/15, 11:57 PM, "Sumit Gupta" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >So I tried attaching the big and ugly patch (due to all the commits and
>> >merges that I failed to squash) and got rejected by the mail server
>>due to
>> >the size of the attachment.
>> >
>> >I have however attached a plain 'git diff' from master which is
>> >hopefully a lot easier to read. Let me know if something else will
>>make it
>> >easier. The branch itself of course is pushed and may just be easy
>>enough
>> >to look at in your IDE.
>> >
>> >Sumit.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On 2/17/15, 10:55 PM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >>This sounds like an excellent step forward for the deployment
>>machinery
>> >>of
>> >>Knox - good work!
>> >>It will also provide even greater compatibility with Hadoop platform
>> >>deployments.
>> >>
>> >>We should continue this work to define collections of versioned
>>services
>> >>as
>> >>a single Hadoop platform definition - composites.
>> >>I would also like to see providers referenced as reusable
>>configurations
>> >>of
>> >>security policy as we have discussed offline.
>> >>
>> >>I will spend some time reviewing this work tomorrow.
>> >>Is there a single patch available for the review?
>> >>
>> >>On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Sumit Gupta
>> >><[email protected]>
>> >>wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I'm looking for comments, feedback and essentially a review of the
>> >>>branch
>> >>> KNOX-481. It contains work related to the jira of the same name.
>> >>>
>> >>> At the highest level, the changes involve removing boiler plate code
>> >>>for
>> >>> adding a service that involved deployment and dispatch contributors
>>and
>> >>> replacing it by writing an xml file. The file needs to be called
>> >>> 'service.xml' (in this initial version) and be placed alongside the
>> >>> corresponding rewrite.xml file if there is one.
>> >>>
>> >>> The existing service 'definitions' have been converted to use this
>> >>>format
>> >>> and can be found in a new maven module called
>> >>>gateway-service-definitions.
>> >>> Just to recap, these services are:
>> >>>
>> >>>   1.  Hbase
>> >>>   2.  Hive
>> >>>   3.  Oozie
>> >>>   4.  Webhcat
>> >>>   5.  Webhdfs
>> >>>   6.  Yarn
>> >>>
>> >>> The structure of the files (and the files themselves) also make
>>their
>> >>>way
>> >>> into in the knox assembly under the 'data' directory.
>> >>>
>> >>> Without delving into the xml file too much, I am hoping that the
>> >>>existing
>> >>> service files provide enough of an example as does the fake service
>>for
>> >>>the
>> >>> test case.
>> >>>
>> >>> Other than that, some minor things of note are:
>> >>>
>> >>>   1.  The httpclient is now shared a bit more than it was previously
>> >>>(it
>> >>> was created for each request before)
>> >>>   2.  The service definitions can now be versioned and the topology
>>can
>> >>> specify a version. If none is specified, the latest should be
>>picked.
>> >>>   3.  The dispatch class can still be customized either by
>>specifying a
>> >>> contributor or a class name.
>> >>>   4.  To make the writing of a custom dispatch easier, there is a
>> >>> configuration injection framework (thanks to Kevin Minder) that will
>> >>>inject
>> >>> objects onto the dispatch instance from FilterConfig or
>>ServletContext.
>> >>>
>> >>> Sumit
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>>

Reply via email to