Awesome - thanks, Lars! On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Lars Francke <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Larry, > > I only have minor things, formatting and typos etc. so I'll just do a patch > against 0.7.0. > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:24 PM, larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Lars - > > > > That period between a release and when the next version is copied to a > new > > directory does happen to be a slightly awkward spot. > > Generally, yes, you copy the 0.7.0 version to an 0.8.0 directory and > > rebuild it all with 'ant'. > > > > Now, if you have a contribution for the docs then you can certainly do it > > in 0.7.0 - as long as it is for a feature that exists in 0.7.0. > > Then when someone else copies it to 0.8.0 it will move with it. > > > > We treat the current release docs as a living breathing documentation > > rather than freezing it with the release. This way we can fix > > things in it while working on the next release. > > > > It might make sense to add the copying of the directory to the next > release > > as part of the release process. Though fixes to the docs for a recent > > release are easier when it is the latest version in the docs too. It is > > something to consider anyway. > > > > thanks, > > > > --larry > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Lars Francke <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Just a quick question about your documentation. > > > > > > I see that it's in SVN and versioned but what if I want to contribute a > > fix > > > now for the next version? Generate a patch for the latest (0.7.0) or > copy > > > the docs over to a 0.8.0 directory and make my change there? Or > something > > > different entirely. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Lars > > > > > >
