Should we add a link in the documentation to point to the demo? 2016-01-19 14:19 GMT+01:00 larry mccay <[email protected]>:
> That's great! > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Jérôme LELEU <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Following my own idea, here is a demo with the Knox / pac4j support: > > https://github.com/pac4j/knox-pac4j-demo > > Feel free to submit pull requests if you want me to amend it. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Thanks. > > Best regards, > > Jérôme > > > > > > 2016-01-18 11:03 GMT+01:00 Jérôme LELEU <[email protected]>: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > It's great news! > > > > > > One more thing I'm thinking of: we always have a demo corresponding to > a > > > pac4j support. It would be great to have a knox-pac4j-demo and > reference > > it > > > from the manual. I can handle it. > > > > > > Does it make sense? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > Best regards, > > > Jérôme > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-01-17 6:37 GMT+01:00 larry mccay <[email protected]>: > > > > > >> KNOX-641 and KNOX-642 have both been committed to master. > > >> > > >> There is a new docs book where you can check out the pac4j docs > > available: > > >> > > >> > > > http://knox.apache.org/books/knox-0-8-0/user-guide.html#Pac4j+Provider+-+CAS+/+OAuth+/+SAML+/+OpenID+Connect > > >> > > >> I have some additional ideas for the docs that I will roll out in the > > next > > >> few days. > > >> > > >> We need to discuss the identity assertion approach for 0.8.0. > > >> > > >> I think we are on track for 1/29 release date. > > >> > > > > > >
