Hi, You're right: maintaining the demos is a work in itself and we could (should) put samples in the templates directory.
Though, I think the demo is valuable to promote Knox: let's say someone as an Hadoop installation and want to secure it: how can he try Knox? Checkout the source, build it, copy the templates at the right place: it might be discouraging and complicated for a beginner. While with the demo: checkout, copy the launch command and test... In any case, it's in the pac4j organization. Thanks. Best regards, Jérôme 2016-01-19 16:11 GMT+01:00 larry mccay <[email protected]>: > Hmmmm... > > I think that providing appropriate templates (see the templates directory > in the knox install) for both the knoxsso.xml (instead of idp.xml) and > sandbox.xml to reflect the same config would provide the same value and be > self contained without the need to keep the binaries up to date in the demo > with each release. > > There is probably value in a blog for early access to pac4j provider demo > that could point to the demo. > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Jérôme LELEU <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Should we add a link in the documentation to point to the demo? > > > > 2016-01-19 14:19 GMT+01:00 larry mccay <[email protected]>: > > > > > That's great! > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Jérôme LELEU <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Following my own idea, here is a demo with the Knox / pac4j support: > > > > https://github.com/pac4j/knox-pac4j-demo > > > > Feel free to submit pull requests if you want me to amend it. > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Jérôme > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-01-18 11:03 GMT+01:00 Jérôme LELEU <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > It's great news! > > > > > > > > > > One more thing I'm thinking of: we always have a demo corresponding > > to > > > a > > > > > pac4j support. It would be great to have a knox-pac4j-demo and > > > reference > > > > it > > > > > from the manual. I can handle it. > > > > > > > > > > Does it make sense? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Jérôme > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-01-17 6:37 GMT+01:00 larry mccay <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > >> KNOX-641 and KNOX-642 have both been committed to master. > > > > >> > > > > >> There is a new docs book where you can check out the pac4j docs > > > > available: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > http://knox.apache.org/books/knox-0-8-0/user-guide.html#Pac4j+Provider+-+CAS+/+OAuth+/+SAML+/+OpenID+Connect > > > > >> > > > > >> I have some additional ideas for the docs that I will roll out in > > the > > > > next > > > > >> few days. > > > > >> > > > > >> We need to discuss the identity assertion approach for 0.8.0. > > > > >> > > > > >> I think we are on track for 1/29 release date. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
