Larry,
I'm +1 on the content, timing and you being RM.
Kevin.



On 3/8/16, 9:22 AM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote:

>All -
>
>I'd like to volunteer to be the release manager for the 0.9.0 release
>unless someone else would like to take it instead.
>
>In addition, I think that we need to scope the release and driving usecases
>and a target date for the release.
>
>We currently have ~25 JIRAs slated for 0.9.0 and most fall into one or more
>of the following categories:
>
>* dependency upgrades and related fixes
>* proxying of UIs for Ambari and Ranger and related issues
>* the hosting of web applications
>* the addition of an application for a default KnoxSSO form based login
>* PAM authentication provider - MISSING DOCs and TESTs
>* various bug fixes and incremental improvements
>
>It seems that around half of these are already set to fixed.
>
>If there are additional issues that folks would like to get into the 0.9.0
>release then we should discuss anything that would require a sizable change
>and file JIRAs for them asap.
>
>I believe that from the above categories that we can adjust the driving
>usecases from the 0.8.0 release to reflect the shift of focus from external
>applications to:
>
>1. SSO participation by applications like Ranger and Ambari while being
>proxied through the gateway.
>
>2. Authentication natively done by Ranger and Ambari applications while
>being proxied through Knox.
>
>3. the usecase of a custom application like the Knoxplorer sample can now
>be hosted by Knox and this needs to be covered and tested with KnoxSSO.
>
>4. Default Knox authentication with form based application as KnoxSSO IDP.
>
>5. any additional API support and various features and improvements.
>
>It seems to me that we could start considering a 1.0 release. If this seems
>like a reasonable time to do that then we should open up discussion for any
>additional improvements or changes that we'd want to include in order to
>make it our 1.0.
>
>Given the above scope and driving usecases, I'd like to propose an end of
>March release.
>
>Thoughts?
>
>thanks,
>
>--larry

Reply via email to