Awesome !
Thanks Sumit. 

> On Oct 24, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Sumit Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Sandeep. I think that is a valid suggestion and something I should
> be able to throw in for this iteration as well.
> 
> Thanks again for the feedback!
> 
> Sumit
> 
> 
>> On 10/24/16, 1:09 PM, "Sandeep More" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Sumit,
>> 
>> The KIP looks great ! apologies for not jumping in earlier :(
>> I have a suggestion to add "request failure" metrics, perhaps in the later
>> iterations.
>> 
>> KNOX-643 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-643> already covers
>> the requirement for unsuccessful and failed logins, it would be good to
>> have a failure count for request/response so one can keep track of
>> occasional or unexpected failures once a while.
>> 
>> Thanks !
>> Sandeep
>> 
>>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:23 AM, sumit gupta <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> All,
>>> 
>>> I would like to solicit comments and feedback on KIP-2 and work done
>>> in the patch for KNOX-643. The topic of adding metrics to the gateway
>>> has been discussed before and resulted in KNOX-643. At this point I am
>>> looking for an initial implementation that satisfies some of the main
>>> requirements and allows us to get to the rest of the requirements in
>>> an iterative process. This is essentially what is described in KIP-2.
>>> 
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KNOX/KIP-2+Metrics
>>> 
>>> While some more content has to be added to the document (especially
>>> around graphite/grafana reporting), the main ideas should come across
>>> and hopefully are enough to start the discussion and help shape the
>>> initial contribution that I would like to get into the codebase by the
>>> end of this week (unless there are significant changes needed based on
>>> feedback).
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> Sumit
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to