I agree with the -1 and the issue found being severe enough to cancel the VOTE.
Please look for the new RC and VOTE email that should be out soon. Thanks! Sumit On 12/23/16, 9:09 AM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote: >Testing that has been completed: > >* verified signatures >* built from source and unit tests run >* webhdfs via ShiroProvider and SSOCookieProvider with KnoxSSO >* Knox Manager Admin UI via HTTP Basic >* Knox Manager Admin UI via KnoxSSO - FAILED > >I have identified that the admin-ui fix is simply the ordering of the >policy roles in the service definition and is a very easy fix. > >I am inclined to say -1 on this RC but might be able to be convinced to >accept the HTTP Basic only limitation with the initial offering. >Although, it is a very easy fix..... > >So, for now here is my: > >-1 > > >On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 6:23 AM, McParland, John <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> from my testing >> >> - md5 of .tar.gz is correct >> - deployed to HDP 2.4 sandbox successfully >> - webhdfs check fine >> - Solr support via Knox is working >> >> I'm not a PMC but I'll give it my vote anyway :) >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks, >> >> John McParland MIET CEng | System Architect, ODSC >> Health Local and Scotland | CGI >> CGI Ltd (UK) >> Second Floor, Inovo Building, 121 George St, Glasgow, UK, G1 1RD >> M: +44 7920 183 019 >> [email protected] | www.cgi-group.co.uk >> >> CGI IT UK Limited. A CGI Group Inc. Company >> Registered Office: 250 Brook Drive, Green Park, Reading RG2 6UA, >> United Kingdom. Registered in England & Wales - Number 947968 >> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: Proprietary/Confidential Information belonging >>to >> CGI Group Inc. and its affiliates may be contained in this message. If >>you >> are not a recipient indicated or intended in this message (or >>responsible >> for delivery of this message to such person), or you think for any >>reason >> that this message may have been addressed to you in error, you may not >>use >> or copy or deliver this message to anyone else. In such case, you should >> destroy this message and are asked to notify the sender by reply e-mail. >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: sumit gupta [[email protected]] >> Sent: 23 December 2016 02:01 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox 0.11.0 >> >> A candidate for the Apache Knox 0.11.0 release is available at: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/knox/knox-0.11.0/ >> >> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/knox.git >> Branch v0.11.0 (git checkout -b v{gateway-version}) >> >> The KEYS file for signature validation is available at: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/knox/KEYS >> >> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Knox 0.11.0. >> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at >> least three +1 Apache Knox PMC votes are cast. >> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Knox 0.11.0 >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... >>
