Hey everyone, I wanted to circle back to this discussion on the next release. As I am writing this email there are 39 open issues marked up for 0.12.0. About 10 of them have patches available but still need to be tested and merged. That still leaves us with a lot of open issues to get to with the original time frame in mind. I propose that we spend some more time rationalizing what we want to go into the next release and come up with a new target release date.
If we want to remain focused on KnoxShell improvements we probably also need to have a separate DISCUSS thread on scoping that effort for the next release and talk about what it will mean to get it out of beta mode. Sumit. On 12/27/16, 4:29 PM, "Sumit Gupta" <[email protected]> wrote: >Sounds great! I am impressed with the uptake of the KnoxShell in the >community and just KIP-4 is probably worthy of a quick release. So I >second the focus as well as the release timeframe. We should also talk >about how to take the client shell and its programming capabilities out of >the Œbeta¹ type of positioning we have in docs and maybe highlight it as a >prominent feature of Knox. > >Good stuff! I look forward to 0.12.0! > >Sumit > > > >On 12/27/16, 3:27 PM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>All - >> >>As we are wrapping up the VOTE for 0.11.0, we should start to consider >>the >>focus of the 0.12.0 release. >> >>We already have a sizable collection of JIRAs assigned to 0.12.0, ~30 >>actually. >>Nearly 10 already have patches available and are largely if not entirely >>focused on the KIP-4 KnoxShell Improvements [1] space. >> >>I propose that we make KIP-4 the driving focus of 0.12.0 with the >>continued >>work on outstanding issues from previous releases and KIPs. >> >>Additionally, there are some continued improvements that could be added >>to >>the Admin UI such as surfacing some of the metrics work done in 0.10.0 >>and >>perhaps gateway-site.xml config. >> >>As for timing, I would like to suggest the end of January (31st) for now >>and see what we can get done in that timeframe. >> >>Thoughts? >> >>thanks, >> >>--larry >> >> >>1. >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KNOX/KIP-4+KnoxShell+Improvem >>e >>nts > >
