Very well, I hereby cancel the VOTE on rc1.
I will spin a new RC this weekend and start a new VOTE.

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Sandeep More <moresand...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
> We can also squeeze in Knox-994 fix for Zeppelin :)
>
> Best,
> Sandeep
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Aug 11, 2017, at 10:45 PM, Philip Zampino <pzamp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I agree that the significance of the Firefox issue, coupled with the
> > potential to include additional issues, justifies a new RC.
> >
> >> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:03 PM, larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> I have come across a Firefox specific issue with KnoxSSO and have
> >> determined that the knox.js file in the knoxauth application needs to be
> >> patched.
> >> The issue was reported to me off of list but basically - once you
> attempt a
> >> login with invalid credentials, you cannot correct them and successfully
> >> login without a refresh or change to the URL.
> >>
> >> I feel that this is a serious enough issue with KnoxSSO to warrant
> >> cancelling the VOTE for this release candidate.
> >> There are a couple other issues that we could probably pull into a new
> RC
> >> as well.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 11:01 AM, larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Colm -
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the review!
> >>>
> >>> Can you file JIRAs for those issue and set fix version to 0.14.0?
> >>> I don't see them as blockers but we should definitely clean them up.
> >>>
> >>> If there is an issue to block this rc - we can pull those in as well.
> >>>
> >>> thanks again!
> >>>
> >>> --larry
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <
> >> cohei...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 (non-binding). Just some trivial issues - the knoxshell dist could
> do
> >>>> with a README at the top level explaining what the distribution does,
> or
> >>>> at
> >>>> least pointing back to the website. Also, the samples README for
> >> knoxshell
> >>>> references the 0.5.0 userguide.
> >>>>
> >>>> Colm.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Sandeep More <moresand...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks Larry !
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>> * Downloaded and built from source (with Java 1.8.0_101)
> >>>>> * Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files
> >>>>> * Verified GPG/MD5/SHA signatures for Knox and Knoxshell release
> >>>> packages
> >>>>> * Installed pseudo-distributed instance (Mac OS X )
> >>>>> * Ran through knox tests
> >>>>> * Checked websocket functionality
> >>>>> * Checked java script compression (Ambari UI)
> >>>>> * Checked Topology Port Mapping feature
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best,
> >>>>> Sandeep
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:47 PM, larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> All -
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Since there were no code changes required to fix the issue, we will
> >>>>>> consider this
> >>>>>> to still be rc-1. The artifacts somehow did not package properly
> >> last
> >>>>> time.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We need to rigorously test this release given the changes to
> >> encoding
> >>>>>> and query string parsing that have gone in.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> A candidate for the Apache Knox 0.13.0 release is available at:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/knox/knox-0.13.0/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/knox.git
> >>>>>> Branch v0.13.0 (git checkout -b v0.13.0)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The KEYS file for signature validation is available at:
> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/knox/KEYS
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Knox 0.13.0.
> >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of
> >> at
> >>>>>> least three +1 Apache Knox PMC votes are cast.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Knox 0.13.0
> >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Colm O hEigeartaigh
> >>>>
> >>>> Talend Community Coder
> >>>> http://coders.talend.com
> >>
>

Reply via email to