+1, sounds good to me. Colm.
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:27 AM, Sandeep More <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Thanks Larry ! > I will merge master into the feature branch for KNOX-998 (Branch name: > KNOX-998-Package_Restructuring) and try to create a diff for the changes. > > Best, > Sandeep > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 8:44 PM, larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > All - > > > > I have made a pass through all of the open JIRAs that are marked for > 0.14.0 > > and moved out obvious candidates that are unlikely to have patches in the > > next week or so and were not explicitly part of the release KIPs. > > > > If there were any moved out that you feel strongly about and can commit > to > > getting a patch in within the next few days then please feel free to pull > > them back in with some justification. > > > > We still have 25 outstanding JIRAs which is too many to be able to close > > down in a week given our current closedown rate. I will need to make > > another pass to descope. > > > > I have asked for status on a few JIRAs and a number of actual patches > that > > need revisions and folks haven't responded. I will need to move these out > > as we are reaching the end of Knoxtober which is the target date for > 0.14.0 > > or 1.0.0. > > > > The one main patch for 1.0.0 is the repackaging of all of our classes to > > get away from packages with the name hadoop in them. KNOX-998 is the JIRA > > tracking this work. We will need to make a decision on merging the > feature > > branch for KNOX-998 into master in the next couple days. It may be a good > > idea to try out that branch in your environments to make sure that it > works > > for you. Assuming we get this branch merged, I will propose that the > > release move forward as 1.0.0. > > > > thanks, > > > > --larry > > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
