[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-1524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16650648#comment-16650648
]
Kevin Risden edited comment on KNOX-1524 at 10/16/18 1:49 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
I sent a [message to the Hive user
list|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hive-user/201810.mbox/%3CCAJU9nmhgkHqOpP5TOC-c%3Dz7Bs_%2Br6KY7R9U%2B6qK6cH5Pvccr7g%40mail.gmail.com%3E]
to see if there are any recommendations about making HiveServer2 perform
better in HTTP mode.
was (Author: risdenk):
I sent a message to the Hive user list to see if there are any recommendations
about making HiveServer2 perform better in HTTP mode.
> Hive "select *" performance evaluation
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: KNOX-1524
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-1524
> Project: Apache Knox
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Kevin Risden
> Assignee: Kevin Risden
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.2.0
>
>
> While looking at WebHDFS performance in KNOX-1221, I decided to look a bit
> more into performance for common use cases. Hive performance is another area
> that could use some research.
> Use "select * ... limit" to get a comparison of raw return speed from
> HiveServer2. This should show how fast results can be streamed through
> HiveServer2 and Knox. Compare the results to "hdfs dfs -text" since this will
> render the data directly from HDFS. This should give comparisons for the
> difference in overhead between HDFS, HiveServer2 binary, HiveServer2 HTTP,
> and HiveServer2 HTTP with Knox.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
