Hi,

Now that the release is out, can we merge the log4j change as well?

https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/488

Attila

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 9:00 PM larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote:

> Let's please make sure that communication is on this list or in the JIRA.
> If it needs to be summarized from an offline conversation that is fine but
> it needs to be recorded in Apache.
>
> thanks!
>
> --larry
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 1:44 AM Sandor Molnar <[email protected]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Sandeep More indicated he would like to have
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2679 included in v1.6.0 so
> I'm
> > going to wait for him to finish his PR today.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sandor
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 8:43 AM Sandor Molnar <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, Larry, for moving those JIRAs out.
> > > One of the two pending items belongs to me and I already resolved it.
> > > Let's wait until the only one is resolved and then I'm going to create
> > the
> > > branch point tag as well as the new v1.6.0 branch and proceed with the
> > > release (including documentation).
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Sandor
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 8:55 PM larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> All -
> > >>
> > >> I've moved all 1.6.0 fixVersion JIRAs out to 2.0.0 but 2 that need to
> be
> > >> resolved as either fixed or moved out to 2.0.0.
> > >> Again, any critical issues for 1.6.0 that were moved out can be moved
> > back
> > >> with justification and a PR for the patch.
> > >>
> > >> If we decide we need a patch release on 1.6.0 before 2.0.0 we may need
> > to
> > >> add it to multiple branches depending on the timing.
> > >>
> > >> thanks,
> > >>
> > >> --larry
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 1:15 AM larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > One of the first things we need to do is start moving out JIRAs
> tagged
> > >> for
> > >> > 1.6.0 to 1.7.0 or 2.0 that just aren't going to make it in.
> > >> > I will start this process over the weekend.
> > >> >
> > >> > Anyone that wants to make sure that we get certain JIRAs in 1.6.0
> > please
> > >> > update with a comment to that effect.
> > >> > Also, once I move it out feel free to move back with a comment of
> > >> > justification.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 11:19 AM larry mccay <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Of course - thank you for volunteering to be RM for 1.6.0!
> > >> >> Also for bringing up the release topic again.
> > >> >> Let's definitely start that ball moving.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Feel free to reach out with any questions on the release process
> and
> > >> keep
> > >> >> an eye out for anything that we need to update in the wiki page.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 3:33 AM Sandor Molnar
> > >> <[email protected]>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> Thanks, Larry, for your vote in favor of the next v1.6.0 Apache
> Knox
> > >> >>> release.
> > >> >>> It'd be an honor to be the release manager this time. I already
> read
> > >> >>> the Release
> > >> >>> Process <
> > >> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KNOX/Release+Process>
> > >> >>> documentation and preparing my environment to start the release in
> > the
> > >> >>> next
> > >> >>> few days.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> In case of any objection, please let me know!
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Cheers,
> > >> >>> Sandor
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 5:28 PM larry mccay <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> > Thanks for starting this thread, Sandor!
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>> > I completely agree.
> > >> >>> > In fact, the log4j2 change may actually be considered to be an
> > >> >>> incompatible
> > >> >>> > change.
> > >> >>> > We may want to consider this 1.6.0 release to be the final 1.x
> > >> release
> > >> >>> and
> > >> >>> > move to a 2.0 release of Knox.
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>> > +1 to spinning a release over the next couple of weeks.
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>> > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 8:20 AM Sandor Molnar
> > >> >>> <[email protected]
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > wrote:
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>> > > Hi folks!
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > > There have been more than 9 months or so since we released
> > 1.5.0.
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > > We have around 117 resolved/closed JIRAs:
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20%3D%20KNOX%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.6.0%20order%20by%20updated%20DESC
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > > Attila Magyar is ready with a really huge change that requires
> > >> >>> upgrading
> > >> >>> > to
> > >> >>> > > log4j2:
> > >> >>> > > https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/488
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > > I think this change should be merged after we released v1.6.0
> so
> > >> that
> > >> >>> > there
> > >> >>> > > is going to be time to update the documentation with the
> effects
> > >> of
> > >> >>> this
> > >> >>> > > important and complex change.
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > > I propose that we take this opportunity to release v1.6.0 over
> > the
> > >> >>> next
> > >> >>> > > couple of weeks and target a release in early October.
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > > Thoughts?
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > > Thanks,
> > >> >>> > > Sandor
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>


-- 
*Attila Magyar* | Staff Software Engineer

cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>

[image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>

[image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image: Cloudera
on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
------------------------------

Reply via email to