[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2777?focusedWorklogId=793169&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-793169
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on KNOX-2777:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 20/Jul/22 11:24
            Start Date: 20/Jul/22 11:24
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: MrtnBalazs commented on code in PR #608:
URL: https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/608#discussion_r925488891


##########
gateway-spi-common/src/main/java/org/apache/knox/gateway/session/control/ConcurrentSessionVerifier.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.knox.gateway.session.control;
+
+
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.config.GatewayConfig;
+
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.Set;
+import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap;
+import java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock;
+import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock;
+
+public class ConcurrentSessionVerifier {
+  public static final ConcurrentSessionVerifier INSTANCE = new 
ConcurrentSessionVerifier();
+  private Set<String> privilegedUsers;
+  private Set<String> nonPrivilegedUsers;
+  private int privilegedUserConcurrentSessionLimit;
+  private int nonPrivilegedUserConcurrentSessionLimit;
+  private Map<String, Integer> concurrentSessionCounter;
+  private Lock sessionCountModifyLock = new ReentrantLock();

Review Comment:
   Then we would have to give them value in the constructor which is private, 
because of the singleton pattern and in the test cases we would not be able to 
initialize the same verifier multiple times.





Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 793169)
    Time Spent: 2.5h  (was: 2h 20m)

> Implement concurrent session verifier
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KNOX-2777
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2777
>             Project: Apache Knox
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Server
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Sandor Molnar
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>          Time Spent: 2.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The following needs to be implemented in the scope of this JIRA:
>  * we need 4 new Gateway-level configurations:
>  ** privileged user list (defaults to an empty collection)
>  ** non-privileged user list (defaults to an empty collection)
>  ** session limit for privileged users (defaults to 3)
>  ** session limit for non-privileged users (defaults to 2)
>  * if a session limit for any of the groups is set to a negative number, that 
> means the users in that group are allowed to have an unlimited number of 
> sessions
>  * In addition to the new configs, a verifier has to be implemented that 
> enforces the following business logic: if a user is listed in the 
> above-introduced privileged/non-privileged collection AND is about to pass a 
> configured session limit the verification should fail. The verification 
> should succeed if the given user is declared neither a privileged nor a 
> non-privileged user.
> The new verifier implementation may be placed in the {{gateway-spi-common}} 
> project for now.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to