Hey Kevin,

Sorry I was unclear. I meant, making the actual release candidate,
and then calling the VOTE on its release. I didn't mean calling the
VOTE to decide whether or not to make the RC.

My bad, should have been specific.

Thanks for all of your effort!

Cheers,
Chris

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++




-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Minder <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:59 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release

>I sent the [DISCUSS] yesterday and Chris suggested waiting 24 hours and
>calling a vote which is exactly what I did.  What am I missing?
>
>On 3/28/13 4:36 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
>> Well this could have been a discussion.. But in any case, +1.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Minder
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release.  My reasons for
>>> wanting a release at this time are:
>>>
>>> 1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we
>>>try
>>> it.
>>> 2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
>>> 3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
>>> 4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
>>>
>>> The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>>> [ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because...
>>>
>>> Kevin.
>>>
>

Reply via email to