Hey Dilli,

Again I totally agree that using a real user (e.g. bob) in the samples would be better than relying on a system user (e.g. hue) would be better. However for the samples we need to strike a balance between correctness and ease of use. Ideally I'd rather not have users have to do the extra steps you suggest below to follow the samples.

At any rate there doesn't appear to be a home directory for the user use in the Sandbox VM. Since the samples work using hue as the user a having a home directory doesn't appear to be required.

Kevin.

On 9/5/13 1:38 AM, Dilli Arumugam wrote:
Hi Kevin,

Let me try testing with new sandbox.
Meanwhile, I guess the error could be due to the fact that there is no hdfs home directory for "bob".

I had to create it during my tests with secure cluster.
Not sure whether I hit the problem with simple cluster.
My bad that I did not document it or bring it to the attention of the group.

The steps to create hdfs home directory for bob in a non secure hadoop.

su hdfs
hadoop fs -mkdir /user/bob
hadoop fs -chown bob /user/bob

Using "bob" or something that sounds like an end user name than "hue" would be preferrable. Knox samples should illustrate Knox handling calls from endusers than user hue or user hdfs

Thanks.
Dilli











On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Kevin Minder <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Dilli,
    As part of your fix for KNOX-76 you changed all of the samples to
    use not use Hadoop service identities.  This is a good thing.
    However I'm not sure that using a totally fictitious user (i.e.
    bob) is really going to work either.  The way that Sandbox (our
    primary test/sample vehicle) is currently setup both WebHCat and
    Oozie job submissions fail when the user bob is used.  Note that
    WebHDFS operations work fine when user "bob" is used.  Just to get
    everything working again I've changed all of the samples to use
    the user "hue".  This works well for examples/testing against
    Sandbox but isn't very general.  I would like your thoughts on
    this.  Should we look into asking for a change in Sandbox to make
    things more open or do you have some other suggestion?  The
    related jiras are: KNOX-108 and KNOX-109.  You can look at the
    patch attached to KNOX-108 to see what I did.
    Kevin.




--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.

Reply via email to