'pruning fails with IS NOT NULL' and 'DNS resolves killing tservers' were both fixed in 1.0.1. I'll write up notes for IN LIST.
- Dan On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey devs, > > I'm doing a pass over the stuff committed since 1.0.1 > <https://github.com/apache/kudu/compare/1.0.1...master> and here's a list > of patches that *may* need release notes (feel free to disagree): > > - Todd's WAL retention change > https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/127438af30356f1afedb86 > 2166c907ff754d1c55 > - Todd's fix to UPSERTS with only PKs specified: > https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/9911c489c45b3a261ee50a > d1f837387b4953421b > - Todd's leader pre-elections > https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/45c1512fcc42772173490b > e4e7aefcf45129fed2 > - Todd's fsync'ing of tombstoned tablets fix > https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/141de3377e6bdd95b8a455 > d262c00066f23bc021 > - Todd's crash fix when deleting tablets > https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/cf976a40e05389dd2f3de0 > 98835c09c50a7526b5 > > - Dan's Partition pruning fails with IS NOT NULL > https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/ce17a9c4eb34dcfe63c8d4 > 321d38d18a0cb8c5c2 > - Dan and Sameer's IN LIST predicate > https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/9b50bd585f62834f9d6578 > 7344e545bd6846404c > - Dan's bug fix for DNS resolves killing tservers > https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/fc5e6a3e7921b9a4758481 > 17063e2d7db56f8ee4 > > - Dinesh's leader step down tool: > https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/833abea787d3ac4bde3e52 > 92c82b3408aad9ba92 > > - Alexey's deprecation of CountBufferedOperations > https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/8613415b2eafd5457a68a9 > 1c1c0e22b96e8c6f1d > > - Maxim's dumping of version info when starting servers > https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/ba36a0b7d122545ae99fb2 > a2e7e9c7e0035669b1 > > - Adar's preallocation improvement (since we're already release noting it > as a problem) > https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/abea8c69f786cc884c50be > 810a7eee7200caec03 > > I'm about to post a patch for the Java client changes so I won't list > those. There's also all the security-related stuff that I'm not sure what > could require release notes. > > J-D >
