+1 (non-binding)

Built and ran in release mode on macOS 10.12.4 (kudu-tool-test failed,
mentioned
above to be a known issue) and with TSAN on CentOS 6.6 (all passed).


Andrew

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:48 AM, William Berkeley <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Checked the checksums. Built on OS X 10.11.6 in release mode, ran tests
> with ctest -j1. Only failure was the expected-on-OS-X failure of
> kudu-tool-test (that's fixed on master).
>
> -Will
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Built Kudu on Mac OS X (ver 10.11.6) from source in debug mode,
> > ran tests with ctest -j4.  3 tests failed, but that are test-only issues
> > which are either already fixed or fixes are pending in the main trunk:
> >
> >   encoding-test (fix is pending, see KUDU-2119)
> >   delete_table-itest (fix is out for review:
> > https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/7972/)
> >   kudu-tool-test (fixed with 5583d620 in the main trunk already)
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Alexey
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/5/17 10:40 AM, Dan Burkert wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The Apache Kudu team is happy to announce the third release candidate
> for
> >> Apache Kudu 1.5.0.
> >>
> >> Apache Kudu 1.5.0 is a minor release which offers many improvements and
> >> fixes since the prior release.
> >>
> >> The is a source-only release. The artifacts are staged here:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/kudu/1.5.0-RC3
> >>
> >> Java convenience binaries in the form of a Maven repository are staged
> >> here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> >> kudu-1015.
> >>
> >> It is built from this tag:
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=kudu.git;a=commit;
> >> h=9101f85fa4ec465b490720629eb5a0caba2563dd
> >>
> >> KEYS file: http://www.apache.org/dist/kudu/KEYS
> >>
> >> I suggest going through the README, building Kudu, and running the unit
> >> tests, and testing the Maven artifacts.
> >>
> >> The vote will run until Friday, September 8th at 12pm PDT.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Andrew Wong

Reply via email to