A potential ideas list, with internals architecture would be great.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:40 PM Mike Percy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Atri, do you have suggestions on what we could do better next time?
>
> Mike
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:56 AM Atri Sharma <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I wanted to contribute a while back, but there was hardly any support
> > on new contributors and especially the ones who wanted to write larger
> > features and bugs.
> >
> > Just my 2c
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:16 PM Sailesh Mukil
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 7:37 PM, Mike Percy <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:22 PM Grant Henke
> > <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have started a document for blog post ideas/topics here:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/12QFRIhNDMoOI1kOQBgch64xYJ9t6U
> > > > byVt1D3NaTl7lI/edit?usp=sharing
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Nice list, Grant. Actually I think that quarterly email would probably
> > make
> > > > for a better blog post instead and I've added it as a suggestion on
> > that
> > > > doc.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:04 PM Mauricio Aristizabal <
> > [email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I was disappointed that Strata SJ 2018 didn't have a single session
> > on
> > > > > Kudu, there were no committers in attendance that I could tell, and
> > it
> > > > > wasn't being highlighted at all in the Cloudera booth.  Between
> > Strata
> > > > and
> > > > > ScalaDays I must have enthusiastically mentioned the product to 15
> > people
> > > > > and none had heard of it.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, that is disappointing, and a bit surprising. Perhaps everybody
> > thought
> > > > everybody else was going to submit... actually I had intended to
> > submit a
> > > > talk proposal to Strata this year but got busy and missed the
> > deadline. :(
> > > >
> > > > I wonder if folks using Kudu would like to present on their use case?
> > I'm
> > > > sure conference-goers would like to hear from more people using Kudu
> > "in
> > > > anger" (hopefully not angrily).
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 2:59 PM Sailesh Mukil
> > <[email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > A suggestion to add on to the easily downloadable pre-built
> > packages, is
> > > > to
> > > > > have easily accessible/downloadable example test-data that's fairly
> > > > > representative of real world datasets (but it doesn't have to be too
> > > > > large). Additionally, we can write tutorials in kudu/examples/ that
> > use
> > > > > this test data, to give new users a better feel for the system.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > That sounds useful. Any ideas on where we could find such a data set?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Starting with a small scale factor of TPC-H and TPC-DS might not be a bad
> > > idea.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:59 AM Tim Robertson <
> > [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > ++1 on the mini cluster
> > > > > Perhaps include a docker image build at the same time which
> > presumably
> > > > > wouldn't be much effort?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm not really sure there is a lot of overlap between creating a Docker
> > > > image and the kind of relocatable artifacts I'm trying to build, aside
> > from
> > > > the actual compiling part. But I think it would be valuable for Docker
> > > > users to be able to easily pull down a Kudu image.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > l'll be happy to contribute on the Java / maven related parts to
> > that. I
> > > > > will use this for the testing framework for the Apache Beam KuduIO
> > and
> > > > will
> > > > > certainly help test / write a blog.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't really know how to handle the Maven part where we unpack the
> > > > tarball and set it up somewhere so we can invoke it from the
> > > > KuduMiniCluster. Maybe it that would require writing a custom Maven
> > plugin?
> > > >
> > > > I'd love to see a blog post about how to use Kudu with Beam!
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> >

Reply via email to