Thanks for volunteering, Alexey.

I looked at 1.3.1, which was the time we did a maintenance release. We
documented the release notes for the maintenance release followed by
the release notes of the minor release. See
https://github.com/apache/kudu/blob/1.3.1/docs/release_notes.adoc for
details.

On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 11:46 PM Alexey Serbin
<aser...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Thank you for addressing KUDU-2990, Adar.
>
> I can run the RM machinery for 1.11.1 and 1.10.1.
>
> BTW, what 1.11.1 and 1.10.1 release notes should include besides a note on
> KUDU-2990?  Should that be the note on KUDU-2990 and the rest of notes for
> 1.11.0 and 1.10.0 correspondingly?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexey
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 5:07 AM Adar Lieber-Dembo <a...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > KUDU-2990 has been fixed on master, so 1.12.0 will be conformant when
> > it is released in several months.
> >
> > I also cherry-picked the fix into branch-1.10.x and branch-1.11.x.
> > Would anyone like to volunteer to RM 1.10.1 and 1.11.1? Besides the
> > usual RM machinery, we need new release notes that document the
> > effects of KUDU-2990.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 8:21 PM Grant Henke <ghe...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 I agree with all of Adars suggestions.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 8:34 PM Alexey Serbin
> > <aser...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thank you for the feedback, Adar.
> > > >
> > > > I'll add the information on the licensing issue into the 1.11.0 release
> > > > announcement I'm about to send.
> > > >
> > > > I asked a question about the proper way of communicating of the issue
> > on
> > > > the LEGAL-487's comment thread, mentioning that we are about to add a
> > > > notice into
> > > > https://kudu.apache.org/docs/known_issues.html#_other_known_issues
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > Alexey
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:20 PM Adar Lieber-Dembo
> > <a...@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > My two cents:
> > > > > - The presence of 1.11.0 on the download page means that 1.11.0 has
> > > > > been de facto released, announcement or no announcement. The
> > > > > announcement doesn't add any additional hurt, so I think we should
> > > > > move forward with it.
> > > > > - Separately, let's also announce the licensing issue and say that
> > > > > we're working to rectify it in all affected release lines. To that
> > > > > end, we will release 1.10.1 and 1.11.1 with the fix ASAP. The
> > guidance
> > > > > offered in LEGAL-487 so far seems to corroborate this.
> > > > > - When 1.12.0 is released several months hence, it will be de facto
> > > > > compliant by virtue of whatever fix first landing in master and then
> > > > > being backported to branch-1.10.x and branch-1.11.x.
> > > > > - I don't know whether we should call this out as a "known issue", as
> > > > > that's typically been used for technical issues rather than legal
> > > > > ones. Would be curious to hear what others think, and maybe you can
> > > > > solicit further feedback in LEGAL-487?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:08 PM Alexey Serbin
> > > > > <aser...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As Adar recently found, both in Kudu 1.10.0 and Kudu 1.11.0 (due
> > to be
> > > > > > announced today) the kudu-binary artifact contains libnuma library
> > > > which
> > > > > is
> > > > > > under LGPL v.2.1, but it's against the ASF 3rd-party license
> > policy:
> > > > > >   https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
> > > > > >
> > > > > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-2990 for details.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apart from the technical discussion on how to resolve that, there
> > are
> > > > few
> > > > > > process-related questions like:
> > > > > >   1. How to address the issue in Kudu 1.11.0, which is de facto
> > already
> > > > > out
> > > > > > of the door?
> > > > > >   2. Should we address the issue in upcoming Kudu 1.12.0 release
> > (about
> > > > > 3-4
> > > > > > month in the future) or implement the solution and release it with
> > Kudu
> > > > > > 1.11.1 ASAP?
> > > > > >   3. If choosing the latter option from the previous item, should
> > the
> > > > > > announcement of the new Kudu 1.11.0 release be postponed/muted, so
> > we
> > > > > > announce only when Kudu 1.11.1 is out with KUDU-2990 addressed?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Given the timing and the fact that Kudu 1.11.0 artifacts are
> > already
> > > > > > published, I think one of the possible paths forward is to proceed
> > with
> > > > > the
> > > > > > announcement of Kudu 1.11.0 release as planned, but add an item
> > about
> > > > > > KUDU-2990 into the 'known issues' document, so it will be
> > available at
> > > > > the
> > > > > > Apache Kudu website:
> > > > > > https://kudu.apache.org/docs/known_issues.html#_other_known_issues
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What do you think?  Your feedback is appreciated.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Alexey
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Grant Henke
> > > Software Engineer | Cloudera
> > > gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke
> >

Reply via email to